“…The IAT has good predictive validity in various domains of psychopathology (Roefs et al, 2011) and is relatively resistant to deliberate faking (Cvencek, Greenwald, Brown, Gray, & Snowden, 2010; Steffens, 2004). Moreover, previous studies have successfully demonstrated the ability of the IAT to accurately characterize the sexual interest of child abusers; results indicate that child abusers more strongly associate “children” and “sex” (or “sexual” or “sexy”) than do other types of offenders (Gray, Brown, MacCulloch, Smith, & Snowden, 2005; Hempel, Buck, Goethals, & van Marle, 2013; Nunes, Firestone, & Baldwin, 2007; Steffens, Yundina, & Panning, 2008). Brown, Gray, and Snowden (2009) even showed that child–sex associations can be used to reliably distinguish pedophilic offenders (who victimize children <12 years of age) from hebephilic offenders (who victimize youths aged 12-15 years).…”