2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2018)080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling conformal gravity amplitudes

Abstract: Conformal supergravity amplitudes are obtained from the double-copy construction using gauge-theory amplitudes, and compared to direct calculations starting from conformal supergravity Lagrangians. We consider several different theories: minimal N = 4 conformal supergravity, non-minimal N = 4 Berkovits-Witten conformal supergravity, mass-deformed versions of these theories, as well as supersymmetry truncations thereof. Coupling the theories to a Yang-Mills sector is also considered. For all cases we give the g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
3
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In even dimensions, the flat space limit is more complicated to evaluate since the analytic structure of CFT correlators is more involved, so here we will focus our attention on odd-dimensional cases. For a parity-invariant but otherwise general CFT with d > 3, we then find that the flat space limit of current correlators is spanned by scattering amplitudes in ordinary and higher-derivative Yang-Mills theory, while the flat space limit of stress tensor correlators is spanned by amplitudes in Einstein, φR 2 and Weyl-cubed gravity, where φR 2 is a curvature-squared theory coupled to scalars which reduces to a certain non-minimal conformal gravity in four dimensions [44]. Remarkably, these theories are related via a double copy [45,46].…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In even dimensions, the flat space limit is more complicated to evaluate since the analytic structure of CFT correlators is more involved, so here we will focus our attention on odd-dimensional cases. For a parity-invariant but otherwise general CFT with d > 3, we then find that the flat space limit of current correlators is spanned by scattering amplitudes in ordinary and higher-derivative Yang-Mills theory, while the flat space limit of stress tensor correlators is spanned by amplitudes in Einstein, φR 2 and Weyl-cubed gravity, where φR 2 is a curvature-squared theory coupled to scalars which reduces to a certain non-minimal conformal gravity in four dimensions [44]. Remarkably, these theories are related via a double copy [45,46].…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite this, they are of interest for a few reasons. Namely, one type of conformal gravity arises in Berkovits-Witten twistor string [31], it is the zero-mass limit of a mass-deformed theory that reproduces Einstein gravity in the infinite-mass limit [32], and it may be useful for computing Einstein gravity amplitude in curved backgrounds for cosmological applications [33,34].…”
Section: Analytical Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.18) given in Ref. [32], where the derivative is implicit in the fact that we have to take the zero mass limit of expressions like (A L (m 2 )−A L (0))/m 2 . This would also explain why our approach fails: the amplitudes we use are well defined only exactly at the factorisation point, where the legs are on-shell and massless.…”
Section: Conformal Gravity: Nmhv (Partial)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The field content includes the 4-derivative gauge field A m , the 3-derivative 6d Weyl spinor Ψ, and the three 2-derivative real scalars Φ I (I = 1, 2, 3). 13 In total, one has 9 + 3 bosonic and 3 × 4 fermionic on-shell degrees of freedom (for each value of the internal index).…”
Section: (10) Supersymmetric Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 This can be easily understood using, e.g., the standard N = 1 4d superspace formulation: the YM field strength Fmn is part of the spinor superfield strength Wα and thus constructing an invariant cubic in Wα is not possible. 13 In the case of the standard (1,0) SYM theory (corresponding to N = 2 SYM theory in 4d) the latter correspond to the auxiliary scalars. 14 Our notation differ significantly from that of [5] (where, e.g., the scalar kinetic term is defined using ǫ ij to raise the indices and thus implicitly is negative definite We suppressed interactions that are more than second order in the scalars and fermions, as they will not contribute to the one-loop divergences in a gauge-field background.…”
Section: (10) Supersymmetric Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%