2005
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2005.v12.n4.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unramified covers of Galois covers of low genus curves

Abstract: Abstract. Let X → Y be a Galois covering of curves, where the genus of X is ≥ 2 and the genus of Y is ≤ 2. We prove that under certain hypotheses, X has an unramified cover that dominates a hyperelliptic curve; our results apply, for instance, to all tamely superelliptic curves. Combining this with a theorem of Bogomolov and Tschinkel shows that X has an unramified cover that dominates y 2 = x 6 − 1, if char k is not 2 or 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For example, all solvable covers of P 1 over a number field are şirin, via e.g. the family given in Section 6 of [2] and the main theorem of Poonen's [13]. More generally, all curves C/K admitting a diagram C ϕ ← − C f − → P 1 over a finite L/K with ϕ étale and f Belyi with all ramification indices above 0, 1, ∞ respectively divisible by a, b, c with 1 a + 1 b + 1 c < 1 are also şirin, by pulling back a suitable hypergeometric family of abelian varieties.…”
Section: L( C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(For example, all solvable covers of P 1 over a number field are şirin, via e.g. the family given in Section 6 of [2] and the main theorem of Poonen's [13]. More generally, all curves C/K admitting a diagram C ϕ ← − C f − → P 1 over a finite L/K with ϕ étale and f Belyi with all ramification indices above 0, 1, ∞ respectively divisible by a, b, c with 1 a + 1 b + 1 c < 1 are also şirin, by pulling back a suitable hypergeometric family of abelian varieties.…”
Section: L( C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us now prove Theorem 3.2. 14 13 Alternatively, combine Theorem 1.1, Lemma 3.4, and Propositions 4.1 and 6.2 to upper bound the index of End K (A) in one of an explicit finite set of rings. 14 Because we chose to state Theorem 3.2 in a previous section (namely immediately after Lemma 3.1 in Section 3.1), it is important to note that no preceding results depend on Theorem 3.2, and so we are e.g.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This map is coming from a search using Belyi's formula (See Definition 21 and the proof of Proposition 23).) Ram(h 6 )=(0, 4, 6, 13, −14, 256, ∞) with corresponding ramification indices 3 9 5 4 , 2 6 3 4 5 4 13, 2 7 3 9 13, 2 12 5 4 , 2 7 3 2 5 2 13, 13, 5 and Bran(h 6 ) ∪h 6 (D 5 ) = (0, 1, ∞).…”
Section: Proof Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, such a fund of examples is supplied by a theorem of Bogomolov and Tschinkel [BT02] (see also [BQ17]) which shows that every hyperelliptic curve has an étale cover which geometrically dominates a curve over Q with CM Jacobian. Poonen [Poo05] generalized this theorem to a more general class of curves, including all superelliptic curves. 1 By now it is well-understood that one can control the rational points of a variety Y by controlling the rational points of the twists of an étale cover of Y .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In §6 and §7, we prove the bounds needed for the dimension hypothesis, which we prove in §8. Finally, in §9, we combine our results with a theorem of Poonen [Poo05] to deduce finiteness of Y (Q) for several classes of curves, including hyperelliptic and superelliptic curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%