2020
DOI: 10.1111/amet.12912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpayable debt

Abstract: In recent decades rural South India has witnessed the profound effects of financialization, effects that include growing sexual puritanism, changing kinship patterns, and the redefinition of caste hierarchies. For Dalit women, these transformations have given rise to new forms of debt, sexuality, and sexual‐economic exchanges. Although such exchanges can be compatible with sexual desire and pleasure, Dalit women are nonetheless trapped in new forms of unpayable debt. Their debts, though quantifiable and financ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers (2019) describes how White slave-owning women participated in this violence by using Black women to care for and nurse their babies, respond to the sexual desires of their husbands and sons, and settle family debts. This violence continues to impact women around the globe, with contemporary evidence in the contexts of oil extraction (Appel 2019;Lerner and Meldrum, 1992;Lyall 2017;Lyall and Valdivia, 2019) and micro lending programs (Guérin and Kumar, 2020;Guérin and Venkatasubramanian, 2020) in the Global South and some lenders in China requiring women to take naked photos of themselves to use as collateral for borrowing money (Liu and Keane, 2021). Black women's refusals and rebellions against this violence are also well-documented (Eddins 2020;Johnson 2020;Jones-Rogers 2019;Hartman 1997Hartman , 2019Stetson 1982).…”
Section: Histories Of Debt: Violence and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers (2019) describes how White slave-owning women participated in this violence by using Black women to care for and nurse their babies, respond to the sexual desires of their husbands and sons, and settle family debts. This violence continues to impact women around the globe, with contemporary evidence in the contexts of oil extraction (Appel 2019;Lerner and Meldrum, 1992;Lyall 2017;Lyall and Valdivia, 2019) and micro lending programs (Guérin and Kumar, 2020;Guérin and Venkatasubramanian, 2020) in the Global South and some lenders in China requiring women to take naked photos of themselves to use as collateral for borrowing money (Liu and Keane, 2021). Black women's refusals and rebellions against this violence are also well-documented (Eddins 2020;Johnson 2020;Jones-Rogers 2019;Hartman 1997Hartman , 2019Stetson 1982).…”
Section: Histories Of Debt: Violence and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hannah Appel (2019) describes similar experiences in the context of debt and oil in Equatorial Guinea. In India, international philanthropic donations established lending programs to encourage low-income women's entrepreneurship; however, lending programs have given rise to new conditions for women to use sex for negotiating their debts (Guérin and Kumar, 2020;Guérin and Venkatasubramanian, 2020;Liu and Keane, 2021).…”
Section: Histories Of Debt: Violence and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Households and kinship serve as frontier space in which value is (re)produced and extracted (cf. Guérin and Kumar 2020).…”
Section: Infrastructuring the Social: From Wealth In People To Wealth...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also differ in our approach to recent work on savings groups in Africa, where they are presented as a direct challenge to prevailing development orthodoxies (O'Sullivan 2023;Dulhunty 2022;Ahimbisibwe and Ndidde 2022;Vokes and Mills 2015;Bannor et al 2020;Musinguzi 2016). Instead, our approach borrows from studies where financialization is inescapable and multisited, where different forms of borrowing are available, each with their particularities, histories and associations, and where individuals navigate their way through a range of options, while also engaging intellectually and critically with the changing financial landscape (Guérin and Kumar 2020;Bähre 2020;Krige 2019;Green 2019;James 2012James , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020; Musinguzi 2016). Instead, our approach borrows from studies where financialization is inescapable and multi-sited, where different forms of borrowing are available, each with their particularities, histories and associations, and where individuals navigate their way through a range of options, while also engaging intellectually and critically with the changing financial landscape (Guérin and Kumar 2020; Bähre 2020; Krige 2019; Green 2019; James 2012, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%