2012
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, studies on environmental design for physical activity in older people suggest that elements of attractiveness and interest increase perceived walkability (Michael et al, 2006; Kerr et al, 2012). On the other hand, however, perceptions of walkability are influenced by design qualities which make environments more accessible, such as legible topography or increased network connectivity (Guo, 2009; Adkins et al, 2012). These qualities have been in fact associated with positive perceptions of usability and walkability both in healthy older individuals (e.g., in relation to street connectivity and accessibility to services; see Rosso et al, 2011; Kerr et al, 2012), and in patients populations (Mitchell et al, 2004; Mitchell and Burton, 2006; Joseph and Zimring, 2007).…”
Section: Complexity and Perceived Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, studies on environmental design for physical activity in older people suggest that elements of attractiveness and interest increase perceived walkability (Michael et al, 2006; Kerr et al, 2012). On the other hand, however, perceptions of walkability are influenced by design qualities which make environments more accessible, such as legible topography or increased network connectivity (Guo, 2009; Adkins et al, 2012). These qualities have been in fact associated with positive perceptions of usability and walkability both in healthy older individuals (e.g., in relation to street connectivity and accessibility to services; see Rosso et al, 2011; Kerr et al, 2012), and in patients populations (Mitchell et al, 2004; Mitchell and Burton, 2006; Joseph and Zimring, 2007).…”
Section: Complexity and Perceived Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of urban qualities that may enhance public use of urban spaces have been identified; these include large-scale structures but also specific design features, such as smaller-scale elements of urban form; i.e., presence of trees, safe crossings, and adequate lighting (see van Loon and Frank, 2011, for a review). In this regard, a detailed understanding of how such micro-scale urban design qualities lead to improved user experience is called for (Adkins et al, 2012; Harris et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of comfort is also contained in the 'spaciousness' [11], 'convenience' [8], 'aesthetics' [14], 'walkway width' and 'walkway quality' [15], 'quietness' [10], and even 'green streets' [16]. Such a broadness of meaning is contained in 'comfort'.…”
Section: • Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially if that walk are children or old people, safety standards will be different from adults or who do not have certain limitations. Safety perceptions from vehicle traffic in the built environment significantly influences walking as transport mode [11,16]. Although traffic volume can be calculated to get the actual amount of traffic, still the perceptions of safety can vary for each person.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%