Keywords: capital campaign , fundraising , artsCAPITAL CAMPAIGNS HAVE THE GOAL of attracting large amounts of funds in short periods of time (Pierpont 2011 ). Thus capital campaigns are qualitatively different from annual drives or the near-constant cultivation of donations that organizations rely on to maintain operational and programmatic activities. As a result of these differences, campaigns can be potentially disruptive to the natural distribution of funds to area nonprofits by disproportionately directing area donations to a single organization.The literature explicitly on capital campaigns is quite limited. Pierpont ( 2011 ) has examined the structure and process of capital campaigns. Woronkowicz ( 2016 ) examines the effects of nonprofit facilities projects on financial vulnerability and finds that, for organizations that build new facilities, capital financing can potentially have adverse impacts on overall financial vulnerability, though it is unclear whether these effects are long term. To date, however, no study has examined the impact of large capital campaigns on the fundraising success of other nonprofit organizations, and studies of how (and whether) the fundraising activity of one nonprofit affects the success of another nonprofit in the same market (Lyons 2003 ;Omura and Forster 2014 ;Twu 2007 ) have produced mixed results.