2017
DOI: 10.3414/me15-02-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unobtrusive and Continuous Monitoring of Alcohol-impaired Gait Using Smart Shoes

Abstract: Alcohol-induced gait disturbances can be detected with smart shoe technology for an automated monitoring in ubiquitous environment. We demonstrated that personal monitoring and machine learning-based prediction could be customized to detect individual variation rather than applying uniform boundary parameters of gait.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Task-oriented, arm-hand training using sensor measurement was introduced in [33], and a machine learning method with pressure sensor–embedded smart shoes discriminated the alcohol-induced gait [34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-oriented, arm-hand training using sensor measurement was introduced in [33], and a machine learning method with pressure sensor–embedded smart shoes discriminated the alcohol-induced gait [34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Kao and colleagues [ 48 ] did not examine the quantity of drinks consumed, but focused its analyses solely on classifying a subject as intoxicated or not, thus limiting applicability across different ranges of BAC. Park et al [ 49 ] used a machine learning classifier to distinguish sober walking and alcohol-impaired walking by measuring gait features from a shoe-mounted accelerometer, which is impractical to use in the real world. Arnold et al [ 9 ] also used smartphone inertial sensors to determine the number of drinks (not BAC), an approach which could be prone to errors given that the association between number of drinks and BACs varies by sex and weight.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common temporal gait parameters such as walking velocity, stride length, foot angle, gait variability, cadence, and foot clearance can currently be obtained in real time by automatic calculation in the microprocessor of an IMS [ 4 , 5 ]. In contrast, temporal gait parameters concerning bilateral lower limbs (GPBLLs) play more important roles in healthcare or daily activity monitoring applications, such as evaluation of walking ability [ 4 ], metabolic evaluation [ 6 ], daily fatigue monitoring [ 7 ], and alcohol use monitoring [ 8 ]. These parameters include the double support time (DST), which is defined as the duration when both bilateral lower limbs touch the ground in one gait cycle (GC), and the symmetry index of stride time ( SIS tr ) and symmetry index of stance phase time ( SIS ta ) between the two limbs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%