2014
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2014.31.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unobserved population heterogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barker frailty augments the force opposing mortality decline with excess mortality among those who, having been exposed to adverse early-life conditions, manifest Barker effects upon attaining adult ages. Our formulation reconciles standard frailty with Barker frailty as survivors to critical ages become a “newly born” cohort at that age that experiences mortality rates with standard frailty and mortality multiplier R δ (rather than δ) (Aalen 1988; Steinsaltz and Wachter 2006; Vaupel and Missov 2014; Vaupel and Yashin 1987; Vaupel et al 1979). …”
Section: Summary Discussion and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barker frailty augments the force opposing mortality decline with excess mortality among those who, having been exposed to adverse early-life conditions, manifest Barker effects upon attaining adult ages. Our formulation reconciles standard frailty with Barker frailty as survivors to critical ages become a “newly born” cohort at that age that experiences mortality rates with standard frailty and mortality multiplier R δ (rather than δ) (Aalen 1988; Steinsaltz and Wachter 2006; Vaupel and Missov 2014; Vaupel and Yashin 1987; Vaupel et al 1979). …”
Section: Summary Discussion and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although there are multiple pathways through which early-life conditions can manifest themselves as delayed effects, the current model treats them all as if they share the same dominant features and ignores dissimilarities. The simplification is needed to make the model tractable as a simple generalization of the standard frailty model (Vaupel and Missov 2014; Vaupel and Yashin 1987; Vaupel et al 1979). Second, unlike the continuous version of the model, it assumes that early conditions can be treated as a 1/0 binary variable and that the population at birth can be classified into those who did and those who did not had adverse experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suppressed those artificial fluctuations over age by having a strong penalty term λ for the P-spline smoothing. Death rates at ages below 80 y for contemporary Sweden , [1] which expresses the population hazard μ(x) as a mixture of Gompertz-distributed hazards with Gamma-distributed "frailty" among individuals (62). We used the same parametric model to estimate mortality for historic Sweden, contemporary Sweden, and Japan at ages 80 y and higher.…”
Section: Box 1 Demographic Distributions and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models for the effects of frailty can be incorporated into the construction of the matrices U i , by replacing the proportional hazard formulation in (11) with an expression appropriate to the frailty effects. Vaupel and Yashin (2006), for example, briefly considered a model in which frailty acted to accelerate aging, with…”
Section: Models For the Effects Of Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vaupel and Yashin (2006) considered a model with two frailty states, z 1 and z 2 . Individuals begin life with frailty z 1 and mortality µ 1 (x), and change from state one to state two at a rate λ(x).…”
Section: Models For the Dynamics Of Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%