2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000080494.04523.da
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmeasured anions and mortality in the critically ill: The chicken or the egg? *

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sex distribution of this study was -male 63.5 % (146/230) and females were 36.5% (84/230). The male predominance so far in admission agrees with other studies like Kapil and Bagga (73%), [16] Hossain et al [17] The main reasons for NICU admission were perinatal asphyxia with complications (24.8%), problems related to preterm low birth weight (20.4 %) and major congenital anomalies (23%) in this study. It was observed that 55.2% of the critically ill newborns treated in the NICU had acid-base derangements and had higher mortality than those without acid-base imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sex distribution of this study was -male 63.5 % (146/230) and females were 36.5% (84/230). The male predominance so far in admission agrees with other studies like Kapil and Bagga (73%), [16] Hossain et al [17] The main reasons for NICU admission were perinatal asphyxia with complications (24.8%), problems related to preterm low birth weight (20.4 %) and major congenital anomalies (23%) in this study. It was observed that 55.2% of the critically ill newborns treated in the NICU had acid-base derangements and had higher mortality than those without acid-base imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No matter how they are calculated, acid–base variables are not reliable indicators of hospital mortality in critically ill patients 21 . In contrast, the study by Cuhaci B claims that, after careful computation, the serum cation gap is a reliable indicator of hospital mortality in critically ill patients 22 . Patient survival at 28 days was tracked by Cusack RJ et al 23 They discovered a significant difference in the mean AG of survivors and non‐survivors ( p = 0.007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21 In contrast, the study by Cuhaci B claims that, after careful computation, the serum cation gap is a reliable indicator of hospital mortality in critically ill patients. 22 Patient survival at 28 days was tracked by Cusack RJ et al 23 They discovered a significant difference in the mean AG of survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.007). The mean SIG did not significantly differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (p = 0.088).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the result is not unexpected since two previous studies reached similar conclusion [ 4 , 5 ]. These results probably support the comment provided by Cuhaci in the accompanying editorial stating “It is probably fair to say that the likelihood of any prospective study to reveal additional important information on the association between any of these acid-base variables and the outcome seems to be remote.” [ 6 ]. However, I would like to comment on several issues about this topic.…”
Section: Main Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By correcting AG with albumin, the difference between ACAG and SIG is theoretically the contribution of Ca, Mg, phosphate, and bicarbonate. Actually, the bias between ACAG and SIG is smaller than the bias between the original AG and SIG [ 10 ], and these two parameters probably significantly correlate as Cuhaci commented [ 6 ]. Collectively, it is also quite reasonable that ACAG and SIG have similar prognostic ability about mortality found in these studies.…”
Section: Main Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%