2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmasking the Mask Debate on Social Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis of this framework is a set of features extracted from the structured and unstructured tweet data that we expect to remain invariant in conversations on various controversial topics and issues. Using these features, accompanied by feature selection and processing along with tuning of hyperparameters of machine learning models, we have also successfully applied this framework to detect tweets that spread anti-mask ( Cerbin et al, 2021 ) and anti-vaccination ( Paul & Gokhale, 2020 ), and those that support Proud Boys, an extremist, radical group ( Fahim & Gokhale, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of this framework is a set of features extracted from the structured and unstructured tweet data that we expect to remain invariant in conversations on various controversial topics and issues. Using these features, accompanied by feature selection and processing along with tuning of hyperparameters of machine learning models, we have also successfully applied this framework to detect tweets that spread anti-mask ( Cerbin et al, 2021 ) and anti-vaccination ( Paul & Gokhale, 2020 ), and those that support Proud Boys, an extremist, radical group ( Fahim & Gokhale, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anecdotally, it is now known that the use of pro-or anti-mask hashtags in a tweet is not a reliable indicator of whether a tweet as a whole leans pro-or anti-mask. Many anti-mask hashtags are creatively embedded in pro-mask tweets and vice versa (Cerbin 2021), and some tweets contain both pro-mask and anti-mask hashtags in an attempt to reach a wider audience and increase engagement with the tweet. Therefore, we manually annotated each tweet into 'A' for anti-mask, and 'P' for pro-mask.…”
Section: Data Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the massive volumes of content shared on social media platforms each day, it is impractical that the content that carries falsehoods and misinformation can be separated manually. Although machine learning may be employed for such classification from a specific data set (Cerbin 2021), it remains a challenge to transfer over or to apply these classifiers to tweets shared outside of that specific period. This is because the percentage of anti-mask content may vary with time and the anti-mask rhetoric incorporates new information about the virus and also presents social and political circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%