2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2019.8741584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmanned Aerial Systems Health Monitoring Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research in real-time health assessment of UAS [68] developed a system that provides good, warning, and failure indications of various UAS subsystems, which results in a comprehensive health diagnostic for the UAS. Three known limitations of this system are as follows:…”
Section: Scenario and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research in real-time health assessment of UAS [68] developed a system that provides good, warning, and failure indications of various UAS subsystems, which results in a comprehensive health diagnostic for the UAS. Three known limitations of this system are as follows:…”
Section: Scenario and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were chosen to provide a similar balance between each of the first three metrics before comparisons were made between the systems. The final metric is a requirement for running on small UAS, which is previously demonstrated on the baseline system [68] and must be evaluated on the test system. Since the baseline system did not include the concept of safe zones and multiple hypotheses, Table 2 The numerical decision criteria for the UAS Dempster-Shafer network.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically all UAS currently include some form of health monitoring, with the minimum being a battery voltage monitor. Various health monitoring architectures have been tested [56,57], with some of the principle decisions being whether the health monitoring subsystem runs on a companion computer or internally on the autopilot hardware, and the implications thereof. While the companion computer enables the health monitoring code to not impact the flight critical (guidance, control, navigation, path planning, etc.)…”
Section: Health Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left display, which is part of the Mission Planner [52] display, includes a heads down display that is pilot-centric. In comparison, the right display, which is part of the GUST [39] display, is operator-centric, only alerting the operator to the status of the vehicle while not providing sufficient information for operator-based flight control level of independence from the primary flight hardware, implementing the health monitoring routines on the primary flight computer gives direct access into all the autopilot data, thereby enabling much more detailed monitoring without bandwidth limitations between the primary flight computer and a companion computer [57].…”
Section: Health Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation