2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11091035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmanned Aerial System Imagery, Land Data and User Needs: A Socio-Technical Assessment in Rwanda

Abstract: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are emerging as a tool for alternative land tenure data acquisition. Even though UAS appear to represent a promising technology, it remains unclear to what extent they match the needs of communities and governments in the land sector. This paper responds to this question by undertaking a socio-technical study in Rwanda, aiming to determine the match between stakeholders’ needs and the characteristics of the UAS data acquisition workflow and its final products as valuable spatial d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in a detailed socio-technical study for Rwanda, Stöcker et al [40] determine the overarching alignment between land administration stakeholder perceptions, the characteristics of the UAV data acquisition workflows, and the final spatial data products obtainable. Additionally, three different UAVs are tested for the quality of data obtainable and the possibilities for using of the technology within the current institutional setting.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a detailed socio-technical study for Rwanda, Stöcker et al [40] determine the overarching alignment between land administration stakeholder perceptions, the characteristics of the UAV data acquisition workflows, and the final spatial data products obtainable. Additionally, three different UAVs are tested for the quality of data obtainable and the possibilities for using of the technology within the current institutional setting.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flight height above the ground for Busogo was 100 m and for Muhoza 90 m. The final Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) was 2.18 cm in Busogo and 2.15 cm in Muhoza. For more detailed information about flight planning and image acquisition refer to [17].…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the degree to which the approach can support participatory mapping could also be investigated. Furthermore, research needs to be done on how to align innovative approaches with existing technical, social, legal and institutional frameworks in land administration [47][48][49]. We are currently pursuing this by developing documentation and testing material [50] that enables surveyors and policy makers in land administration to easily understand, test and adapt our approach.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%