2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlocking the Bottleneck in Forward Genetics Using Whole-Genome Sequencing and Identity by Descent to Isolate Causative Mutations

Abstract: Forward genetics screens with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) provide a powerful way to illuminate gene function and generate mouse models of human disease; however, the identification of causative mutations remains a limiting step. Current strategies depend on conventional mapping, so the propagation of affected mice requires non-lethal screens; accurate tracking of phenotypes through pedigrees is complex and uncertain; out-crossing can introduce unexpected modifiers; and Sanger sequencing of candidate genes is i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fnip1 hamel allele was generated on a pure C57BL/6J background by ENU mutagenesis as previously described (39) Sequencing. Genomic DNA from three C57BL/6J outcrossed hamel mutants was subjected to whole-genome sequencing as described (41). Briefly, 100-bp paired-end libraries were prepared and sequenced on a single lane of an Illumina HiSEq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fnip1 hamel allele was generated on a pure C57BL/6J background by ENU mutagenesis as previously described (39) Sequencing. Genomic DNA from three C57BL/6J outcrossed hamel mutants was subjected to whole-genome sequencing as described (41). Briefly, 100-bp paired-end libraries were prepared and sequenced on a single lane of an Illumina HiSEq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ENUmutagenized mice, early experiments used massively parallel sequencing for mutation identification within a critical region defined by traditional or bulk segregation mapping using recombinant mapping populations produced by outcrossing the mutant to another inbred laboratory strain and backcrossing or intercrossing a second time (2)(3)(4). Later reports demonstrated mapping with the identified sequence variants themselves as markers, which eliminated the need for outcrossing and its potential for altering the mutant phenotype (5,6). However, whole genome/exome sequencing currently remains very costly to apply as the sole method for genotyping large collections of G3 mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, several proof-of-principle studies, each applying different approaches to successfully map a chemically induced mutation using WGS, have been documented in the literature (Sarin et al 2008Blumenstiel et al 2009;Zhang et al 2009;Earley and Jones 2011;Fairfield et al 2011;Andrews et al 2012;Bull et al 2013). In general, a subset of SNVs is first removed based on assay-specific criteria upon which some form of mapping is performed to reduce the number of candidate mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has allowed the successful mutation identification of a handful of mutants in flies, worms, zebrafish, and mice, but the number of complementation groups that were mapped per report is limited. It thus remains unclear how scalable this approach is or what its success rate is when one attempts to apply WGS to identify their mutant of interest Earley and Jones 2011;Andrews et al 2012;Leshchiner et al 2012;Bull et al 2013;Henke et al 2013). The drawback of combining meiotic mapping and WGS is that (1) recombination mapping requires several generations of back-crossing and is less straightforward when recessive lethal mutations are being mapped, and (2) in order to sequence multiple animals per genotype, animals are typically pooled and sequenced on one lane of the Illumina sequencer at a low coverage (43-53), which fails to identify many SNVs that are present in the genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%