2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-021-01918-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unloading contact mechanics analysis of elastic–plastic fractal surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because the actual asperities of rough surfaces are 3D, it is impractical to use 2D fractal theory to represent the 3D asperity. The 3D fractal theory can describe the 3D asperity of rough surfaces and is widely used (Pan et al , 2021). Based on the 3D fractal theory, Li et al (2021) first presented a novel TCR model for liquid–solid interfaces and studied the influences of the TCR between the composite phase change material and the heat source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the actual asperities of rough surfaces are 3D, it is impractical to use 2D fractal theory to represent the 3D asperity. The 3D fractal theory can describe the 3D asperity of rough surfaces and is widely used (Pan et al , 2021). Based on the 3D fractal theory, Li et al (2021) first presented a novel TCR model for liquid–solid interfaces and studied the influences of the TCR between the composite phase change material and the heat source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the real asperities of rough surfaces are 3D, and it is unreasonable to use the 2D fractal theory to describe the 3D asperities. The 3D fractal theory can more realistically describe the asperities of rough surfaces and has been widely used (Pan et al , 2018, 2021). Based on 3D fractal theory, Ji et al (2013) established a TCC model of rough surfaces considering three deformation states of the asperity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, because the actual asperities on rough surfaces are 3D in nature, using 2D fractal theory to depict these 3D features is impractical. The 3D fractal theory can describe the 3D asperity of rough surfaces vividly and is widely used (Pan et al , 2021). Based on the 3D fractal theory, Ji et al (2013) developed a TCC model of rough surface that considers the elastic, elastic-plastic and full plastic deformation of asperities and explored the effects of fractal dimension, fractal roughness and material properties on the TCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%