2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-022-00503-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unleashing the Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement in NGOs through the Lens of JD-R Model: Empirical Evidence from India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More research in this area would be useful for better understanding: (1) the nature of PSM among Canadian public servants, including the relative weight of the PSM dimensions, and the personal characteristics associated with them; (2) the extent to which PSM and its dimensions contribute to desirable employment outcomes (e.g., satisfaction, engagement, retention) in Canada; and (3) how organizational policies and practices affect PSM and, in turn, how PSM affects the success of policies. Moreover, the non‐Canadian literature suggests that PSM among public servants is influenced by job characteristics (Battaglio & French, 2016, Chen, 2015, Danaeefard et al, 2022, Mer et al, 2022), leadership and supervisory styles (Bro et al, 2017, Caillier, 2015, Campbell, 2018, Fazzi, 2016, Jensen & Bo, 2018, Lauritzen, Grøn & Kjeldsen, 2022, Mer et al, 2022, Nguyen et al, 2023; Nurung, Tamsah, & Azis, 2020), organizational climate (Danaeefard et al, 2022; Dinh et al, 2020, Lee et al, 2019; Ripoll, 2022, Ugaddan, 2019, Wang & Seifert, 2020), peer relations (Deng et al, 2021, Dinh et al, 2020, Lauritzen, Grøn & Kjeldsen, 2022, Lee et al, 2020), and training (Chen 2021). We have no evidence of the extent to which these relationships hold or their relative importance in Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research in this area would be useful for better understanding: (1) the nature of PSM among Canadian public servants, including the relative weight of the PSM dimensions, and the personal characteristics associated with them; (2) the extent to which PSM and its dimensions contribute to desirable employment outcomes (e.g., satisfaction, engagement, retention) in Canada; and (3) how organizational policies and practices affect PSM and, in turn, how PSM affects the success of policies. Moreover, the non‐Canadian literature suggests that PSM among public servants is influenced by job characteristics (Battaglio & French, 2016, Chen, 2015, Danaeefard et al, 2022, Mer et al, 2022), leadership and supervisory styles (Bro et al, 2017, Caillier, 2015, Campbell, 2018, Fazzi, 2016, Jensen & Bo, 2018, Lauritzen, Grøn & Kjeldsen, 2022, Mer et al, 2022, Nguyen et al, 2023; Nurung, Tamsah, & Azis, 2020), organizational climate (Danaeefard et al, 2022; Dinh et al, 2020, Lee et al, 2019; Ripoll, 2022, Ugaddan, 2019, Wang & Seifert, 2020), peer relations (Deng et al, 2021, Dinh et al, 2020, Lauritzen, Grøn & Kjeldsen, 2022, Lee et al, 2020), and training (Chen 2021). We have no evidence of the extent to which these relationships hold or their relative importance in Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The job demands-resources model is a widely acknowledged theoretical framework that explains the antecedents and consequences of work engagement by analyzing two dimensions: job demands and job resources [21]. In this model, job demands are typically viewed as negative factors, whereas job resources are considered positive [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, regarding the consequences of HWI, prior literature has examined individual consequences such as effects on health (both physical and mental) ( Kato and Yamazaki, 2009 ; Carlson et al, 2011 ; Milner et al, 2017 ; Pien et al, 2021 ; Lange and Kayser, 2022 ; Milicev et al, 2023 ), work–family conflict ( Cinamon and Rich, 2010 ; Lee et al, 2021 ; Eason et al, 2022 ; Ratnaningsih et al, 2023 ; Tang et al, 2023 ), burnout ( Houkes et al, 2008 ; Dishon-Berkovits, 2014 ; Beauregard et al, 2018 ; Pujol-Cols, 2021 ; De Beer et al, 2023 ; Russo et al, 2023 ), stress ( Demerouti et al, 2005 ; Choi, 2008 ; Bowen et al, 2014 ; Nohe et al, 2015 ; Oshio et al, 2017 ; Olsen et al, 2023 ), intention to leave ( Dåderman and Basinska, 2016 ; Minamizono et al, 2019 ; Rajendran et al, 2020 ; Jolly et al, 2022 ), job and family satisfaction ( Demerouti et al, 2005 ; Bakker et al, 2009 ; Hakanen et al, 2011 ; Syrek et al, 2022 ), and well-being ( Hughes and Parkes, 2007 ; Shimazu et al, 2011 ; Eek and Axmon, 2013 ; El-Kot et al, 2019 ), among others. Job performance ( Shimazu et al, 2012 ; Falco et al, 2013 ; Shimazu et al, 2015 ), affective or aggressive behaviors ( Tricahyadinata et al, 2020 ) and organizational citizenship behaviors ( Choi, 2013 ; Singh and Banerji, 2022 ; Dеу, 2023 ; Mer et al, 2023 ) are identified as HWI situational outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%