2019
DOI: 10.1287/inte.2019.0990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unleashing Analytics to Reduce Costs and Improve Quality in Wastewater Treatment

Abstract: The authors discuss their development of an innovative process that applies descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytics to improve efficiency and reduce costs at wastewater treatment plants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention model for maintenance was optimized using these two indicators. Advanced analytics were applied to optimize WWTP operation and reduce cost (Zadorojniy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention model for maintenance was optimized using these two indicators. Advanced analytics were applied to optimize WWTP operation and reduce cost (Zadorojniy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among its advantages are its ability to identify non-linear relationships in the data, to generate simple and more easily interpreted models from a large number of input variables, to show their relative importance, and to be computationally efficient compared to other techniques [12][13][14]. In the field of WWTPs, it has recently been used in different studies to predict the biochemical and chemical oxygen demand, the nitrogen, phosphorus and total suspended solids concentration [7,15], the activated sludge sedimentation capacity [15] or cost reduction [16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained yielded an airflow reduction of greater than 31%. MARS was also used comparatively with reinforcement learning (RL) and a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) for the WWTP of Lleida, Spain [78]. In that study, RL had some calibration limitations, while MARS had a long runtime of four hours compared with the CMDP, which ran successfully in eight seconds.…”
Section: Machine Learning and Data Mining (Ml-dm) Control And Optimiz...mentioning
confidence: 99%