2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jd033578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions

Abstract:  We use an aerosol-climate model and statistical emulation to find eruption source parameters from eight bipolar sulfate deposition signals  Plausible eruptions have a wide range in SO2 emissions and latitude, and consequently, a large range in radiative forcing  Resulting uncertainties in global mean surface cooling for the largest unidentified historical eruptions are on the order of 1°C Accepted ArticleThis article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although reconstructions of past volcanic forcing have improved (Toohey and Sigl 2017), there is uncertainty in the conversion between volcanic sulfate deposition and the stratospheric sulfur burden, with modelling studies demonstrating that this depends on the properties of an eruption (Marshall et al 2021;Toohey et al 2013) and the model itself (Marshall et al 2018). Uncertainties in past volcanic forcing underpin many model-data discrepancies (e.g.…”
Section: Reconstructing Past Volcanic Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reconstructions of past volcanic forcing have improved (Toohey and Sigl 2017), there is uncertainty in the conversion between volcanic sulfate deposition and the stratospheric sulfur burden, with modelling studies demonstrating that this depends on the properties of an eruption (Marshall et al 2021;Toohey et al 2013) and the model itself (Marshall et al 2018). Uncertainties in past volcanic forcing underpin many model-data discrepancies (e.g.…”
Section: Reconstructing Past Volcanic Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, our simulations can provide insights about and estimates of the uncertainties associated with L G which originate from both atmospheric variability and unknown eruption source parameters. Our estimates build upon previous assessments of uncertainties [47,48], aiming to offer additional insight as well as improve our understanding of intermodel disagreements.…”
Section: Modelled Sulphate Deposition and Implications For Volcanic F...mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To obtain a reliable estimate of the random error of L G resulting from unknown eruption source parameters, it is necessary to sample a wide distribution of eruption source parameters that are representative of real volcanic eruptions. Recent studies applying statistical emulation [48,58] have demonstrated the potential of alternative approaches for evaluating how eruption source parameters impact both radiative forcing and sulphate deposition.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfate concentrations in ice cores have been used to estimate stratospheric sulfur loading, relying on the transport and deposition of volcanic sulfate aerosols to ice sheets 1–2 years post‐eruption (Toohey & Sigl, 2017). While this strategy is useful for identifying the timing of large eruptions and their relative magnitudes, it does not provide source constraints nor does it distinguish stratospheric fall‐out versus sulfur transported through the troposphere (Marshall et al., 2021). In Figure 3b, we compare petrological estimates of sulfur load and ice core estimates over the past 2,500 years, and find that petrologic estimates are systematically higher than the modeled ice core deposition.…”
Section: Multi‐methods Assessment Of Stratospheric S Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%