1959
DOI: 10.2307/480321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unknown Athapaskans: The Identification of the Jano, Jocome, Jumano, Manso, Suma, and Other Indian Tribes of the Southwest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He distrusted the weak direct linguistic evidence, instead surmising an Athapaskan language based on the coordination between Athapaskan-speaking Apache, Suma, and other groups reported by later Spanish documents (Forbes 1960). Forbes's (1959) argument for Athapaskan-speaking Suma is discredited by most scholars, who believe that the alliance of Suma and Apache groups reflects political linkages after the Apache became the dominant openly rebellious Indigenous people (Lockhart 1997;Naylor 1981). Initially, Naylor (1969) agreed that the Suma language was not Uto-Aztecan but rejected an Athapaskan affiliation.…”
Section: Records Of the Spanish Secular And Religious Authoritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…He distrusted the weak direct linguistic evidence, instead surmising an Athapaskan language based on the coordination between Athapaskan-speaking Apache, Suma, and other groups reported by later Spanish documents (Forbes 1960). Forbes's (1959) argument for Athapaskan-speaking Suma is discredited by most scholars, who believe that the alliance of Suma and Apache groups reflects political linkages after the Apache became the dominant openly rebellious Indigenous people (Lockhart 1997;Naylor 1981). Initially, Naylor (1969) agreed that the Suma language was not Uto-Aztecan but rejected an Athapaskan affiliation.…”
Section: Records Of the Spanish Secular And Religious Authoritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process, the recognition of "branches" of the Suma (Bandelier 1890(Bandelier -1892 across Chihuahua was largely lost. The new approach was heralded by Gerald (1951) and Forbes (1959Forbes ( , 1960, who mixed documentary references from the Río Grande and the CGV to paint an amalgamated picture of a bellicose, nomadic Suma aligned with the Apache. In contrast, Griffen (1967Griffen ( , 1979 interpreted crucial colonial records for the province of Nueva Vizcaya, including the CGV.…”
Section: Suma and The Anthropological Imaginationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include the Janos, Jumanos, Jocomes, Sumas, Cholomes, Mansos, Pelones, and Sibolos (Forbes, 1959). All these groups were extinguished or assimilated with other Apaches at an early date.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These include the Janos, Jumanos, Jocomes, Sumas, Cholomes, Mansos, Pelones, and Sibolos (Forbes, 1959). These include the Janos, Jumanos, Jocomes, Sumas, Cholomes, Mansos, Pelones, and Sibolos (Forbes, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%