2013
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2013.808093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Unjust, inhumane and highly inaccurate’: the impact of changes to disability benefits and services – social media as a tool in research and activism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research confirmed previous work suggesting the role of online methods to reach people with disabilities with less cost and encourage disabled people to talk openly more than face to face (Morris, 2013;Sunderland et al, 2014). Such approach helped in addressing diversity but did not guarantee high numbers of participants probably due to the sensitivity of the topic in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research confirmed previous work suggesting the role of online methods to reach people with disabilities with less cost and encourage disabled people to talk openly more than face to face (Morris, 2013;Sunderland et al, 2014). Such approach helped in addressing diversity but did not guarantee high numbers of participants probably due to the sensitivity of the topic in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar to other research (Carlson, 2013;Morris, 2013), one limitation is the inadequate opportunity given to participants with intellectual disabilities due to their gatekeepers' responses or their capacity to consent. This could be overcome by tailoring consent and content to their needs and offering sufficient support, which could be challenging (Goldsmith & Skirton, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of SoMe in recruiting and retaining research participants has been highlighted in various studies on different domains (Balfe et al, 2012;Bull et al, 2011Bull et al, , 2013Child et al, 2014;Das et al, 2014;Kapp et al, 2013;Leonard et al, 2014;Morris, 2013;Mychasiuk & Benzies, 2012). Within the literature analysed in this study, the most common tools used for recruitment and retention were Facebook (Balfe et al, 2012;Child et al, 2014;Kapp et al, 2013;Mychasiuk & Benzies, 2012) and Twitter (O ' Connor et al, 2014) or both, in combination (Leonard et al, 2014;Morris, 2013).…”
Section: Social Media To Recruit and Retain Participantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Changes in benefits, such as the end of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and the introduction of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as well as the closure of the Independent Living Fund (ILF), have meant that many disabled people had to be reassessed and either lost their benefits altogether or were moved to Employment Support Allowance (Cross 2013;Morris 2013;Harwood 2014). It is beyond the scope of this article to describe these changes in detail.…”
Section: Disablism In the Context Of Employment And State Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in England it has been possible for people living with chronic illnesses to apply for some state support in the form of benefits, along with other disabled people, this type of social support has been strongly eroded in the last few years in a fundamental and profound way (Cross 2013;Morris 2013;Harwood 2014). Changes in benefits, such as the end of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and the introduction of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as well as the closure of the Independent Living Fund (ILF), have meant that many disabled people had to be reassessed and either lost their benefits altogether or were moved to Employment Support Allowance (Cross 2013;Morris 2013;Harwood 2014).…”
Section: Disablism In the Context Of Employment And State Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%