Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006267301810187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University Teachers’ Conceptions of Their Role as Developers of Technology-Rich Learning Environments

Abstract: Abstract:This phenomenographic study examines how a diverse group of university teachers conceptualised their role as developers of technology-rich learning environments at one university in Finland. The research findings illustrate a variety of conceptions. Five qualitatively different ways of understanding teachers' roles regarding the development of technology-rich learning environments were found: 1) innovator, 2) early adopter, 3) adaptive, 4) sceptic and 5) late adopter. In order to connect the whole set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their hierarchical arrangement is called an outcome space (Marton and Booth, 1997). Besides the categories, the outcome space may include the themes that are perceived across the categories (Marton and Booth, 1997); these may be called dimensions (González, 2009), or critical attributes of variation (Heinone et al, 2017). The intended use of the categories in the outcome space is ‘to guide teachers to approach learning from their students’ perspectives, or at least to understand why their students might be thinking or doing certain things’ (Polat, 2013: 114).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their hierarchical arrangement is called an outcome space (Marton and Booth, 1997). Besides the categories, the outcome space may include the themes that are perceived across the categories (Marton and Booth, 1997); these may be called dimensions (González, 2009), or critical attributes of variation (Heinone et al, 2017). The intended use of the categories in the outcome space is ‘to guide teachers to approach learning from their students’ perspectives, or at least to understand why their students might be thinking or doing certain things’ (Polat, 2013: 114).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%