2001
DOI: 10.1080/01443410123128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University Students' Value Priorities and Emotional Empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
84
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
84
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our second respondent group, undergraduate students, has formed the subject pool for many of the largest analyses of values across cultures (e.g., Schwartz & Bardi, 2001), and there is now extensive data on the values of Finnish undergraduates using Schwartz's (1992) value circumplex (Myyry & Helkama, 2001). These previous data, therefore, provide us with important baseline information for the analysis of value change following the terrorist attacks, as well as a second set of comparative data for the testing of our research hypotheses.…”
Section: Research Design and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our second respondent group, undergraduate students, has formed the subject pool for many of the largest analyses of values across cultures (e.g., Schwartz & Bardi, 2001), and there is now extensive data on the values of Finnish undergraduates using Schwartz's (1992) value circumplex (Myyry & Helkama, 2001). These previous data, therefore, provide us with important baseline information for the analysis of value change following the terrorist attacks, as well as a second set of comparative data for the testing of our research hypotheses.…”
Section: Research Design and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Finnish sample, for example, out of 12 value 571 Does the Individualist Consume More? types, researchers found that business students gave more importance to the values of power and achievement, social science students gave more importance to universalism, whereas technology students found security values more important (Myyry and Helkama, 2001). Even these observed differences in values were rendered difficult to interpret because of a gender interaction with student type.…”
Section: Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, in a Canadian study, Bradshaw, Murray, and Wolpin (1996) found that with fewer funding sources available, women' s organizations were highly dependent on government grants, and such dependence makes them more vulnerable in times of governmental cutbacks. This is exacerbated by the fact that organizations run by women are not perceived to be prestigious targets for donors (Bradshaw, Murray, and Wolpin, 1996) as they are more likely to focus on the marginalized and disadvantaged members of society (Stewart and Taylor, 1997;Yasmin, 1997), champion social issues, and make benevolence a priority (Myyry and Helkama, 2001;Riordan, 2000;Smith and Schwartz, 1997;Women' s Communication Centre, 1996). As a result, corporations are not usually generous in funding women' s organizations, as they are more interested in supporting causes related to health, education, and culture (Canadian Centre for Philanthropy, 2003;Useem, 1987).…”
Section: Gender Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%