2011
DOI: 10.15700/saje.v31n3a538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University-school partnerships for social justice in mathematics and science education: the case of the SMILES project at IMSTUS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Students having a better mathematical understanding will be able to compete in the world economy. Mathematics and Science are a vital component to improve critical society (Ndlovu, 2011) and reasoning ability (Phonapichat, Wongwanich, & Sujiva, 2014). Success and failure as a society critical can be seen from mathematics and science learning applied in the school.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students having a better mathematical understanding will be able to compete in the world economy. Mathematics and Science are a vital component to improve critical society (Ndlovu, 2011) and reasoning ability (Phonapichat, Wongwanich, & Sujiva, 2014). Success and failure as a society critical can be seen from mathematics and science learning applied in the school.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one cluster, comprising five papers, social justice was associated with equity, aligned with Gutiérrez's (2009) idea of learning to play the game. Interestingly, these five studies cover a wide range of different issues traditionally related to marginalisation and underperformance (see Xenofontos, 2019a), as for example, gender (Halai, 2011), social class and poverty (Mhlolo & Schäfer, 2012;Ndlovu, 2011), ethnicity and culture (Meaney et al, 2009), immigration and learning mathematics in a second language (Planas & Civil, 2009). The studies in this cluster are concerned with supporting learners to develop their competence in classical mathematical knowledge (Gutstein, 2007) and/or their identities as learners of mathematics, by adopting empowerment perspectives (Gutiérrez, 2008).…”
Section: Rq1: Conceptualisations Of Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it was brought back into the core mathematics curriculum, teachers did not feel as confident about the strand since it had not been taught for such a long time. Some researchers note that teachers avoided the teaching of geometry in school because of poor mastery of Euclidean geometry (Atebe & Shaefer, 2009;Ndlovu, 2011). Some teachers find the Euclidean geometry section difficult, even if they had studied it in high school and at tertiary level, let alone those who did not study Euclidean geometry in high school or at tertiary level.…”
Section: Introduction For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%