Psychotherapy Research: An International Review of Programmatic Studies.
DOI: 10.1037/10092-025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University of Ulm: The Ulm Textbank research program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first examples of this approach was the General Inquirer (Stone and Hunt 1963). Other examples of this approach were the research in the scope of the Textbank System (Mergenthaler and Kächele 1991) and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) tool (Chung and Pennebaker 2012;Pennebaker and Francis 1996).…”
Section: Dictionary-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first examples of this approach was the General Inquirer (Stone and Hunt 1963). Other examples of this approach were the research in the scope of the Textbank System (Mergenthaler and Kächele 1991) and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) tool (Chung and Pennebaker 2012;Pennebaker and Francis 1996).…”
Section: Dictionary-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This archival data is used to explore dialectic and thematic aspects of the therapy process, facilitated by the computer's ability to search and sort words and topics. The goals of the "Ulm Textbank Research Program" (Mergenthaler & Kachele, 1991) makes the verbatim transcripts of psychotherapy sessions available to researchers. The Textbank Management System integrates techniques of hguistic analysis and text processing to make texts in the field of psychotherapy accessible to a wide range of users.…”
Section: Northwestern Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this increasing similarity, both interprogram and interregional variations are sufficient to suggest that there are regional and geographical differences in the degree to which process and outcome research is valued. Beutler, Crago, & Machado (1991) concluded that most research programs that intensively study psychotherapy processes, to the relative exclusion of efficacy assessment, are clustered in northern Europe, especially Germany (e.g., Mergenthaler & Kachele, 1991), and the coastal regions of North America (e.g., Honvitz et d., 1991). On the other hand, programs that place relative value on efficacy studies are less easily assigned a geographic concentration in North America because they represent all of the regions of the United States and Canada.…”
Section: Process Versus Outcome Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%