2012
DOI: 10.1108/03074801211273911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University libraries and the postgraduate student: physical and virtual spaces

Abstract: This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While noting that the field had demonstrated some uncertainty concerning what to call its newly repurposed spaces, Bennett mused that they had become so nearly ubiquitous as to have supplanted the card catalog as the "principal means of defining space as library space" (2008, p. 183). A number of contemporaneous authors were also making note of the extent to which academic/research libraries were transforming themselves into study environments, learning spaces, collaboration spaces, makerspaces, and so forth, in which open shelves were being replaced by a variety of other student-oriented library services and non-library services (Beard & Bawden, 2012;Beard & Dale, 2010;Kao & Chen, 2011;Ludwig & Starr, 2005;Montgomery, 2014;Paulus Jr., 2011). By 2015, Bennett was opening an essay in portal: Libraries and the Academy by flatly asserting, "No one now plans an academic library without a learning commons" (2015, p. 215).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While noting that the field had demonstrated some uncertainty concerning what to call its newly repurposed spaces, Bennett mused that they had become so nearly ubiquitous as to have supplanted the card catalog as the "principal means of defining space as library space" (2008, p. 183). A number of contemporaneous authors were also making note of the extent to which academic/research libraries were transforming themselves into study environments, learning spaces, collaboration spaces, makerspaces, and so forth, in which open shelves were being replaced by a variety of other student-oriented library services and non-library services (Beard & Bawden, 2012;Beard & Dale, 2010;Kao & Chen, 2011;Ludwig & Starr, 2005;Montgomery, 2014;Paulus Jr., 2011). By 2015, Bennett was opening an essay in portal: Libraries and the Academy by flatly asserting, "No one now plans an academic library without a learning commons" (2015, p. 215).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those groups highlighted as potentially less confident in using formal channels to approach Library Services for support (first-year, postgraduate, part-time and English as Second Language students (Toner, 2008;Beard & Bawden, 2012;Martin et al, 2012)), the Pop-up Library provides an accessible alternative.…”
Section: Discussion Communication / Interactions With Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson and Reid (2007), in their 12 qualitative interviews with undergraduate students, found that "lack of awareness of services, embarrassment or shyness, anxiety caused by mechanical barriers and affective barriers" were all reasons why enquiry services were not used (p. 405). Lack of awareness and unwillingness to engage with library staff has also been identified in different types of users; for example postgraduate students (Beard & Bawden, 2012) and English as a Second Language students (Martin, Reaume, Reeves, & Wright, 2012). The results of these papers offer libraries a challenge to engage with non-users and to consider proactive ways, inside and outside of the library building, to showcase library resources and remove barriers to access.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technology can be a good medium to share information with students nowadays because they are familiar with technology and therefore the library information will Ida F Priyanto be more engaging and entertaining for them. Beard and Bawden (2012) stated that the library of the future must be a place of study that is equipped with excellent computing facilities, common spaces for collaborative work and adequate silent space; while Niegaard (2011) said that the library should be an "intelligent space" (p. 180). Lippincott (2005) emphasized that "the library offers a venue where academic work can be carried out in a social context.…”
Section: Library and Current Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%