University lecturers’ preparedness to use technology in teacher training of mathematics during COVID-19: The case of Ethiopia

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate Ethiopian university lecturers’ readiness to use technology for teaching mathematics at the tertiary level during the COVID-19 pandemic when they were compelled to adapt to distant education. Using Google Forms, online questionnaires were distributed to 41 lecturers in three Ethiopian universities, of whom eighteen participated. Before the research, the questionnaire was piloted with eight lecturer participants to categorise questions and validate the instrument using the Rasch measurement model. The questionnaire was locally developed based on guidelines from the literature. It purposed to investigate university lecturers’ individual preparedness for technological instruction in terms of their knowledge, beliefs and current, and historical exposure to this mode of instruction. As a counterbalance, some circumstantial factors influencing their readiness were investigated too. Lecturers’ optimistic beliefs about using educational technologies have been found to contrast with some disabling circumstantial factors. This study revealed that the lecturers were generally able and interested in integrating technology into the teaching process but that barriers, primarily at the institutional level, hindered them from doing so. In addition to the technologies suggested in the questionnaire, participants enriched the research findings by adding more possible technologies that lecturers may use for educational purposes. The data was analysed using WINSTEPS (Student Version of WINSTEPS 4.7.0.0) and SPSS version 20. The results showed the reliability of using the instrument was 0.77 based on Cronbach’s alpha. The PT-measure correlation value determined the construct validity (PMC), ranging from 0.23 to 0.71 except item PUT15’s infit and outfit MNSQ between 0.1 to 1.86 and ZSTD range -1.05 to 1.61, which was acceptable. The fit statistics showed that the person separation index, 1.97, was considered good and that the item separation index, 0.63 was within an acceptable range. Person and item reliability were at 0.8 and 0.28, respectively. The result indicated that the new instrument with five items after eliminating unfit items (such as items FAT19, PTT10, KDT1, PTT8 and PTT 12) was reliable and valid to measure the use of technology in the teaching and learning process of the university lecturers.

Higher education institutional innovation: An analysis of challenges to e-academic advising during emergency remote teaching

“…Personal challenges were also reported in a study by Owusu-Fordjour, Koomson and Hanson (2020) on Ghanaian tertiary students who indicated a lack of preparedness for self-guided learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study findings further resonate with Machaba and Bedada (2022), whose study found that institutional and personal factors posed challenges to the use of technology in the higher education environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the study partially diverges from the findings by Machaba and Bedada (2022) in that the prominent barriers to the integration of technology into teaching and learning processes rather proved to be at the institutional level.…”

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Digital Media among Malaysian Teachers and Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic

“…Students felt that it was difficult to practice online learning especially in understanding the content for the subjects related with calculations. This lack of knowledge could be caused by the lack of technology training and technical support (Machaba & Bedada, 2022). Most teachers and students are not physically and mentally ready for online teaching and learning when they lack the knowledge and skills in using digital media.…”

The implementation of telegram as a pedagogical tool to enhance student motivation and interaction in academic writing

“…However, Telegram, through its affordability and flexibility, is such a social media application that makes the world smaller (Aghajani & Adloo, 2018;Aladsani, 2021;Swartz et al, 2022) as it gives students a chance to communicate and interact with other students across geographical barriers. Although e-Learning technologies and mobile learning (m-learning) awareness are ever-increasing (Aladsani, 2021;Dollah et al, 2021;Sevnarayan, 2022;Sevnarayan & Mohale, 2022), lecturers' competences and skills are "challenged when faced with a new reality where digital teaching becomes the primary, if not the only, mode of instruction" (Machaba & Bedada, 2022). Lecturers are opposed to the use of Telegram and other social media applications, as they are unaware of its benefits (Dollah et al, 2021).…”