University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy?

Abstract

University governance reforms are very much a reflection of the broader New Public Management reforms that are focusing on increasing efficiency in public organizations. The article deals with how university reform ideas of a generic nature, emphasizing that universities should be treated and reformed like any other public organizations, are important and reflected in specific reform measures. The special empirical focus is on that universities through reforms are changing their formal affiliation to superior ministries in a more autonomous direction, implicating more autonomy in financial, management and decision-making matters. One the other hand, universities are also through reforms more exposed to more report, scrutiny and control systems, financial incentive systems, pressure to get resources from other sources than the government, cut-back management, etc. So a main question in the analysis is whether universities, as traditionally having quite a lot of real autonomy, through the reforms in fact are getting less autonomy, not more, like the reforms entrepreneurs often are promising. The analysis is based on a transformational approach from organization theory, representing a combination of structural, cultural and environmental factors of explanation for reforms processes and their effects. Empirically the article is based on the author's own empirical studies of university reform and reviews of comparative studies.

Global rankings in the Nordic region: challenging the identity of research-intensive universities?

“…Governance reforms in higher education in recent decades have led to increased focus on autonomy, accompanied by emphasis on management and reporting structures to cater for the increased pressure for accountability (Christensen 2011). In this perspective, global rankings represent a new global standard for university performance and reputation, and represent a source of information for management decisions on how to improve (Kehm and Stensaker 2009).…”

The ‘logic of escalation’ in performance measurement: An analysis of the dynamics of a research evaluation system

“…More often than not, the more 'hands-off' steering of universities, via performance-based governance mechanisms, appears to have led to an extended form of governmental control over universities and their activities (see Capano, 2011;Christensen, 2011). This is because in many instances, and definitely also in Australia, the performance measurement machinery monitoring and steering universities has been set up in a highly centralized and top-down manner.…”

Unidad de acción comprometida: una propuesta de solución ante el problema universitario del servicio a la sociedad

“…El modelo de la Nueva Gestión Pública (NPM, del original inglés New Public Management), se fundamenta en movimientos propuestos desde el mundo anglosajón, principalmente experimentados en Australia, Nueva Zelanda (Christensen, 2011) y Chile (Spinoza, 2008) desde los primeros años de la década de los ochenta. Consiste básicamen-te en aplicar el modelo de gestión empresarial a las administraciones públicas, priorizando la competitividad, la eficiencia y la productivi-dad y estableciendo una orientación hacia el consumidor o cliente.…”