2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University employees' preparedness for natural hazards and incidents of mass violence: An application of the extended parallel process model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, response efficacy refers to the effectivity of a proposed or recommended response for avoiding or mitigating the threat of a disaster. Individuals with high efficacy attempt to react and formulate the nature of their responses to the perceived threat of a disaster [ 48 , 49 ]. The perceived threat and confidence level of a person determine his/her motivations and actions.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, response efficacy refers to the effectivity of a proposed or recommended response for avoiding or mitigating the threat of a disaster. Individuals with high efficacy attempt to react and formulate the nature of their responses to the perceived threat of a disaster [ 48 , 49 ]. The perceived threat and confidence level of a person determine his/her motivations and actions.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the perceived efficacy outweighs the perceived threat or the repeated exposure to disaster information reduces the perceived threat, the danger control process motivates individuals to adaptively deal with the perceived threat of a disaster [ 47 ]. Individuals with high efficacy attempt to react and formulate the nature of their responses to the perceived threat of a disaster [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model mainly incorporates three previous studies on fear appeals, the fear-as-acquired model [ 20 ], the parallel process model [ 21 ], and protection motivation theory [ 22 , 23 ]. This latest theoretical development has inspired a long list of follow-up empirical research because of its strong explanatory power in the field of public health communication and disaster preparedness research [ 8 , 24 , 25 ]. However, Popova [ 26 ] closely examined the entire body of literature concerning this model and found that the EPPM's propositions and assumptions were not fully explored and supported and that its operationalized constructs were measured differently in different studies.…”
Section: Extended Parallel Process Model (Eppm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Questionnaire for measuring three dimensions—attitudes, intentions, and behaviours. For example, six preparedness behaviours are defined as danger control responses: reading (i) daily email and (ii) emergency alerts, access to (iii) radio and (iv) first aid kits, watching (v) educational videos on responding to the threat, and viewing (vi) educational posters on responding to the threat [ 25 ]. Fear control responses Emotional process producing a defensive motivation in which a significant threat renders an individual unable to adopt the recommendations through coping mechanisms—e.g., defensive avoidance, denial and reactance [ 27 ].…”
Section: Extended Parallel Process Model (Eppm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation