University brand image as competitive advantage: a two-country study

Abstract

Purpose Given the competitive landscape in the higher education setting, it is important that universities adopt strategies that create competitive advantage for them. Universities must leverage their resources efficiently to address this goal. Creating a positive brand image is one such strategy. The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize university brand image as its heritage, service quality and trustworthiness and investigate their relationship with student’s satisfaction. It also investigates the role of university reputation as a mediating variable. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through a mixed method approach. The first stage involved qualitative interviews and focused group discussions with students to understand the factors responsible for student satisfaction with their respective universities. The second stage involved administering a survey questionnaire in two geographies – the USA and India to investigate the hypothesized relationship. The authors use regression analyses to test these relationships. Findings Findings indicate that a distinct brand image plays an important role in students’ level of satisfaction across both the USA and India. Service quality has a greater impact on student satisfaction levels across both contexts (as compared to university heritage and trustworthiness). The authors also find a positive mediating effect of university reputation in the relationship between university brand image and student satisfaction levels. Originality/value The current research contributes to the services marketing literature in the university context. It offers a framework for decision making in universities. It suggests that universities must work toward developing their brand image by focusing on its three dimensions – heritage, trustworthiness and service quality.

Heads of Departments Leadership Styles, Work Climate and Organizational Commitment Enhance the Job Performance of University Lecturers

“…Educational institutions are vying and struggling to consider as top-notch institute worldwide, in providing knowledge, education, skilled professionals and research opportunities in all domains of science and technology (Deem, Mok& Lucas 2008). Further,competition in the higher education sector is intensifying (Panda et al, 2019;Berry & Cassidy, 2013). In this dynamic environmental situation higher education institutions are confronting with many challenges to achieve goals.…”

IT Innovation: Improving Competitive Advantages of Higher Education Institutions

“…Hence, it becomes a challenge for universities in digital, industrial era 4.0 (Lian, 2019;Yalina & Rozas, 2018). A university must be able to strengthen its competitive advantages and competitiveness in order to maintain its existence (Boscor, 2015;Mainardes, et al, 2011, Panda, et al, 2019. It is also expected that higher education institutions continue improving the program quality so that great graduates can be produced (Ambarita, 2017;Anwar & Pane, 2019;Rusmini, 2015).…”

Institutional personas – Dis/harmonic representations of higher music education

“…While long acknowledged as a general trend, there is a diversity in the degree to which institutions have adapted to marketisation discourse (Lažetić, 2019). However, self-promotion has gained increasing importance for higher education institutions (Drew, 2013;Panda, Pandey, Bennett, & Tian, 2019). While various documents emanating from universities have been studied (e.g.…”