2010
DOI: 10.1007/bf03321759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality Type Limits for Bergman Orthogonal Polynomials

Abstract: Abstract. We establish universality type limits for Bergman orthogonal polynomials on simply connected regions in the complex plane with smooth boundary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the subject has experienced a new surge, with many new interesting results in a variety of topics such as the asymptotic behavior and zero distribution of the orthogonal polynomials [4,6,7,8,10,11,12,14,16], universality and Christoffel functions [9,14,20], and the existence of recurrence relations [1,18,19]. In particular, [6] and [20] consider orthogonality over several domains, while [14] considers orthogonality with respect to certain potential theoretic varying weights.…”
Section: Introduction and New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the subject has experienced a new surge, with many new interesting results in a variety of topics such as the asymptotic behavior and zero distribution of the orthogonal polynomials [4,6,7,8,10,11,12,14,16], universality and Christoffel functions [9,14,20], and the existence of recurrence relations [1,18,19]. In particular, [6] and [20] consider orthogonality over several domains, while [14] considers orthogonality with respect to certain potential theoretic varying weights.…”
Section: Introduction and New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Model Case. As in [24], we begin by proving Theorem 1.4 in one specific case. We will consider area measure on the region G r,m , which we denote by µ 0 .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many of the results of [24,Sections 3 & 4] do not depend on the simple connectivity of the support of the measure, only on the fact that z 0 is a peak polynomial point (as defined in [24]) and a model case for comparison. Rather than duplicate the proof in [24], we provide here only a sketch of the necessary arguments. The first step in proving the general case is to establish estimates on the Christoffel functions, specifically on expressions of the form lim n→∞ n 2 λ n (u n ; µ), where u n ∈ ∂G r,m and |u n −u| = O(n −1 ) as n → ∞ for some u ∈ ∂G r,m ∩D.…”
Section: Recall Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If J ⊂ ∂G, a ∂G neighborhood of J means a relatively open subset J 1 of ∂G containing J. In [58], I proved:…”
Section: Bergman Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%