2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9sm01361j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality of the collapse transition of sticky polymers

Abstract: The universality of the swelling of the radius of gyration of a homopolymer relative to its value in the θ state, independent of polymer-solvent chemistry, in the crossover regime between θ and athermal solvent conditions, is well known. Here we study, by Brownian dynamics, a polymer model where a subset of monomers is labelled as "stickers". The mutual interaction of the stickers is more attractive than those of the other ("backbone") monomers, and has the additional important characteristic of "functionality… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters a and b are determined by applying the two boundary conditions, namely, U SDK mn ¼ 0 at r à mn ¼ r à c and U SDK mn ¼ Àε mn at r à mn ¼ 2 1/6 s*. The appropriate choice of the cutoff radius r à c has been investigated extensively in a recent study (48), and it has been shown that a value of r à c ¼ 1.82s* leads to an accurate prediction of the static properties of a polymer chain in poor, theta, and good solvents. The same value is adopted in this study.…”
Section: Polymer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters a and b are determined by applying the two boundary conditions, namely, U SDK mn ¼ 0 at r à mn ¼ r à c and U SDK mn ¼ Àε mn at r à mn ¼ 2 1/6 s*. The appropriate choice of the cutoff radius r à c has been investigated extensively in a recent study (48), and it has been shown that a value of r à c ¼ 1.82s* leads to an accurate prediction of the static properties of a polymer chain in poor, theta, and good solvents. The same value is adopted in this study.…”
Section: Polymer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repulsive part is unaffected by the choice of potential parameter ϵ ij . The attractive part is modelled by which, unlike the Lennard-Jones potential, smoothly reaches zero at the cut off radius r c = 1.82σ [44, 45]. We simulate the chromatin polymer using Brownian dynamics simulations, where the time evolution of the bead positions are governed by an Ito stochastic differential equation.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repulsive part is unaffected by the choice of potential parameter ij . The attractive part is modelled by 1 2 ij cos (αr 2 ij + β) − 1 which, unlike the Lennard-Jones potential, smoothly reaches zero at the cut off radius r c = 1.82σ [44,45]. Parameters α and β control the r c (see supplementary information (SI)).…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constructed using a cosine function which smoothly approaches zero at the cut-off distance, r c . A detailed comparison of the SDK potential with the Lennard-Jones and the WCA potential has been performed recently [62].…”
Section: A Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the value of beyond zero results in a decrease in the solvent quality. A special feature of the SDK potential [62] is that modifying the value of allows one to tune the attractive interactions selectively, without affecting the repulsive branch of the pair-potential. This is in stark contrast to the more commonly used Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential for which changing the well-depth affects both the attractive and the repulsive branches.…”
Section: A Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%