Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab452a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality of quantum diffractive collisions and the quantum pressure standard

Abstract: This work demonstrates that quantum diffractive collisions are governed by a universal law characterized by a single parameter that can be determined experimentally. Specifically, we report a quantitative form of the universal, cumulative energy distribution transferred to initially stationary sensor particles by quantum diffractive collisions. The characteristic energy scale corresponds to the localization length associated with the collision-induced quantum measurement, and the shape of the universal functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser cooled atoms confined in a magnetic or magneto-optical trap can be used as sensors of absolute pressure and particle flux measurements in vacuum [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. For example, the background gas density or pressure can be determined by observing loss of trapped atoms induced by collisions with ambient atoms or molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laser cooled atoms confined in a magnetic or magneto-optical trap can be used as sensors of absolute pressure and particle flux measurements in vacuum [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. For example, the background gas density or pressure can be determined by observing loss of trapped atoms induced by collisions with ambient atoms or molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have recently demonstrated a different approach to determine the collision cross section by measuring the dependence of loss of trapped atoms on the trap depth [11]. Such measurements rely on the universal function (p QDU6 ) for the energy distribution imparted to the sensor atom by quantum diffractive collisions mediated by van der Waals interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cold-atom vacuum standards promise to deliver accurate measurements of vacuum in the ultra-high vacuum (UHV, < 10 −6 Pa) and extreme-high vacuum (XHV, < 10 −9 Pa) regimes. [1][2][3][4][5] In these regimes, hot-cathode ionization gauges, such as Bayard-Alpert gauges and their derivatives, are the typical means of pressure measurement. [6][7][8] Yet they suffer from several known systematics, including unwanted X-rayinduced currents, electron stimulated desorption of ions and neutrals, and thermal outgassing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, all cold-atom vacuum standards have been laboratory-scale devices and are not suitable replacements for an ionization gauges. 1,4,5 Here, we directly compare two portable cold-atom vacuum standards (pCAVS) based on ultracold lithium, the main components of which have been used to demonstrate a compact apparatus for laser cooling and trapping of strontium. 9 The gauge head (not including the laser system) fits within a roughly 15 cm × 35 cm × 50 cm cuboid; the vacuum components of our standard comprise a total volume of approximately 1.3 L. The cost of the cold-atom vacuum standard is primarily driven by the laser system used to cool, trap, and count the atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* Electronic mail: umakant.rapol@iiserpune.ac.in While previous studies on BGC-induced shifts have mainly focused on H 2 because it is typically the dominant species present in the vacuum chamber, it is anticipated that as the clock uncertainties continue to improve, it may become necessary to account for the contribution of other background gas species such as N 2 . Dispersion coefficients have been estimated for collisions of N 2 with alkali, noble, and various molecular gases and collisional cross sections have been reported for Rb−N 2 [21,22], Ne*−N 2 [23,24], Na−N 2 [25] and Ar−N 2 [26], but so far Sr−N 2 collisional properties have not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%