1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.27.2327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal unfolding of Hamiltonian systems: From symplectic structure to fiber bundles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, the lhs of Eq. (2.43) is the field of a Dirac magnetic monopole (see, for example, Balachandran et al , 1983), and Eq. (2.43) defines 2 as its potential, which notoriously has a string of singularities (that can be put anywhere by a choice of gauge).…”
Section: T7mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a matter of fact, the lhs of Eq. (2.43) is the field of a Dirac magnetic monopole (see, for example, Balachandran et al , 1983), and Eq. (2.43) defines 2 as its potential, which notoriously has a string of singularities (that can be put anywhere by a choice of gauge).…”
Section: T7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.18) or a theory with the usual interactions and the propagator Eo, but whose wave functions are subject to twisted boundary conditions. In the former case physical observables are modified because the added interaction may contribute to conserved quan4The theory of wave functions localized on paths has been developed by Zaccaria et al (1983) and Balachandran, Fromm, and Sorkin (1987). For an axiomatic (algebraic) approach see also Frohlich, Cxabbiani, and Marchetti (1989).…”
Section: B the Braid Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical symmetry group is SO(3), while the quantum symmetry group for some quantizations is SU(2); see [8,27]. An electron in the field of a magnetic monopole is also a good example; see [6,Chapter 7] and [11,35].…”
Section: The Set Of Path Components Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dirac's ideas lead naturally to consideration of a quantum mechanics in which the wave function has a nonintegrable (or path-dependent) phase factor. This formalism has been developed by various authors (see, for example [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] and references therein). In general, the path-depndent wave function can be written as…”
Section: Nonassociative Gauge Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%