2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.235108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal signatures of Dirac fermions in entanglement and charge fluctuations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, entanglement entropy is a well-established probe of quantum matter and of gapless edge modes in particular, as was shown e.g. in 2D droplets [39,51], at interfaces between fractional quantum Hall states [52][53][54], or in 3D topological insulators with hinge modes [55,56]. Since we are dealing here with non-interacting fermions, calculations simplify considerably [40][41][42][43][44]: one can relate the entanglement spectrum to that of a subregion-restricted correlation matrix, reducing the computation of many-body entanglement to a one-body problem.…”
Section: Quantum Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, entanglement entropy is a well-established probe of quantum matter and of gapless edge modes in particular, as was shown e.g. in 2D droplets [39,51], at interfaces between fractional quantum Hall states [52][53][54], or in 3D topological insulators with hinge modes [55,56]. Since we are dealing here with non-interacting fermions, calculations simplify considerably [40][41][42][43][44]: one can relate the entanglement spectrum to that of a subregion-restricted correlation matrix, reducing the computation of many-body entanglement to a one-body problem.…”
Section: Quantum Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They are rather quasi-periodic, since Z n (α + 2π) = e 2πiδ(Φ) Z n (α) as anticipated below (6). Also note that (25) enjoys the relation Z (25) for Z1(α) with Φ = 0 for perimeters L = 2, 4, 10, and its (dashed) integral approximation (26). Both log Z1(α) and its approximation are divided by L for readability.…”
Section: Exact Charged Momentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Both log Z1(α) and its approximation are divided by L for readability. The approximation becomes more accurate as L grows, save for the divergence at α = ±π (corresponding to Z1(±π) = 0 when Φ = 0) that cannot be captured by the integral (26). Around its maximum at α = 0, log Z1(α) behaves as a concave parabola, eventually giving the near-Gaussian behavior (27).…”
Section: Exact Charged Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations