1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0052928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Routing Strategies for Interconnection Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend consulting [31], which is a very readable presentation of this problem as well as many more details and variants than we cover here. We note that [28] studied a more general version of the packet-routing problem, so their choice of parameters was not (and could not be) optimized.…”
Section: Packet Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We recommend consulting [31], which is a very readable presentation of this problem as well as many more details and variants than we cover here. We note that [28] studied a more general version of the packet-routing problem, so their choice of parameters was not (and could not be) optimized.…”
Section: Packet Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general strategy for our construction is based on [31] with some small changes to parameters. We will add random delays to each packet, and then allow the packet to move through each of its edges in turn without hesitation.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will improve some choices of parameters, as well as examine more closely instances in which the congestion is controlled on very small scales. So, we will first examine the packet-routing problem using the standard LLL; this extends the analysis of [29] and [25]. We will then show how to enhance this to handle the nonlinear increasing functions that arise, by using our assignment LLL.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A seminal result proven in [20] (via iterated application of the LLL, which has become a key tool in its own right [21]) is that in fact T ≤ O(C + D) for all input instances, using constant-sized queues at the edges; both this result and its approach, have been used in much work in networks and combinatorial optimization. This argument was refined and simplified in [29,25], leading to a (constructive) bound of 23.4(C + D) [25]. By introducing several new ideas in scheduling packets along time intervals, we improve this to 7.26(C + D) (non-constructively) and 8.84(C + D) (constructively), thus approaching the simple lower bound for this fundamental problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%