The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-020-00784-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Reconfiguration of Facet-Connected Modular Robots by Pivots: The O(1) Musketeers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the requirement that 3D configurations contain no non-convex holes requires global information to evaluate, which is undesirable. Follow-on work in [25] showed additionally that in 2D, if a configuration is not admissible, then as long as there are at least 5 free modules, reconfiguration is always possible.…”
Section: A Reconfiguration For Pivoting Cubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the requirement that 3D configurations contain no non-convex holes requires global information to evaluate, which is undesirable. Follow-on work in [25] showed additionally that in 2D, if a configuration is not admissible, then as long as there are at least 5 free modules, reconfiguration is always possible.…”
Section: A Reconfiguration For Pivoting Cubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeds allow shapes which are blocked or incapable of meaningful movement to perform otherwise impossible transformations. The use of seeds was established in a previous work [22], and more recently shown to enable universal reconfiguration in the context of connectivity preserving transformations [21], however to our knowledge there has been no attempt to investigate this problem using a seed which is a connected shape fully introduced before the transformation is initiated.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such transformations are highly desirable due to the large numbers of programmable matter systems which rely on the preservation of connectivity. Progress in a very similar direction was made in another paper [21], which used a similar model but allowed for a greater range of movement, for example "leapfrog" and "monkey" movements. They accomplished universal transformation in O(n 2 ) movements using a "bridging" procedure which added up to 5 nodes during the procedure as necessary in a manner similar to the seed idea from the previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The assumed mechanisms in those models can significantly influence the efficiency and feasibility of shape transformations. For example, the authors of [2,17,18,19,27] consider mechanisms called sliding and rotation by which an agent can move and turn over neighbours through empty space. Under these models of individual movements, Dumitrescu and Pach [17] and Michail et al [27] present universal transformations for any pair of connected shapes (S I , S F ) of the same size to each other.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When l h sees 1 ○, it calls CollectArrows to draw one L-shaped route // Manhattan distance ∆ > i 8b. Otherwise, l h sees 2 ○ and calls CollectArrows to draw two L-shaped route…”
Section: Definition 1 (A Route) a Route Is A Rectangular Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%