2017
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/117/10006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal non-adiabatic geometric manipulation of pseudo-spin charge qubits

Abstract: Reliable quantum information processing requires high fidelity universal manipulation of quantum systems within the characteristic coherence times. Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation offers a promising approach to implement fast, universal, and robust quantum logic gates particularly useful in nano-fabricated solid-state architectures, which typically have short coherence times. Here, we propose an experimentally feasible scheme to realize high-speed universal geometric quantum gates in nano-engineere… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20) we have that the subspaces H q evolve in cyclic fashions during the time interval [0, τ ]. These cyclic evolutions actually take place in the Grassmanian G (8,4), the space of all four dimensional subspaces of the eight dimensional Hilbert space of the three qubits k, l, and a. We may call C q the corresponding loops in the Grassmanian G (8,4).…”
Section: B Two-qubit Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(20) we have that the subspaces H q evolve in cyclic fashions during the time interval [0, τ ]. These cyclic evolutions actually take place in the Grassmanian G (8,4), the space of all four dimensional subspaces of the eight dimensional Hilbert space of the three qubits k, l, and a. We may call C q the corresponding loops in the Grassmanian G (8,4).…”
Section: B Two-qubit Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation [2][3][4] compared to its adiabatic counterpart [1] is more compatible with the short coherence time of quantum bits (qubits). To achieve a feasible platform, nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation has been adapted and developed for different physical settings [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation has also been combined with decoherence free subspaces [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], noiseless subsystems [29], and dynamical decoupling [30] to further improve its robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus on non‐adiabatic GQGs. In addition, GQG has also been investigated in the context of semiconductor quantum dots using spin states [ 38,43,69–73 ] and charge states, [ 39,71,74,75 ] based on non‐adiabatic evolutions. Nevertheless, detailed implementation of GQGs in charge qubit systems, especially in those driven by microwave at sweet spots, is lacking in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the holonomic gate using non-adiabatic evolution have been successfully implemented for various system in experiments, including, for example, the superconducting circuits [23,25,26], nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond [27][28][29][30][31][32] and nuclear magnetic resonance [33][34][35]. Several approaches for the non-adiabatic geometric gates have been proposed for the charge qubits in semiconductor dot [36][37][38][39][40]. However, universal HC qubit manipulation in the semiconductor quantum dot is still lacking in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%