2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal methodology for developing univariate sample-specific sex determination methods: an example using the epicondylar breadth of the humerus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
81
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although size-based methods using multiple discriminant analysis or other statistical models such as logistic regression are generally easier to use in determination of sex than morphological methods (e.g., Albanese, 2003;Albanese et al, 2005;), it has been shown that considerable variation exists in robusticity of the distal humerus in South Africans (Steyn & Iscan, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although size-based methods using multiple discriminant analysis or other statistical models such as logistic regression are generally easier to use in determination of sex than morphological methods (e.g., Albanese, 2003;Albanese et al, 2005;), it has been shown that considerable variation exists in robusticity of the distal humerus in South Africans (Steyn & Iscan, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these studies have focused on size differences alone (e.g., Steyn and İşcan, 1999;Albanese et al, 2005;Frutos, 2005), with generally good results producing accuracies that are frequently above 80%. Morphological differences of both the distal and proximal humerus have also been studied, but to a lesser extent (Rogers, 1999;Rogers, 2009;Kranioti et al, 2009;Vance et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observable traits enable sex determination which is an important first step in the analysis of human skeletal remains, as in forensic cases it reduces the number of potential individuals by half [1]. It is also important to determine sex in archaeological collections as it enables the demographic reconstruction of the population studied [2]. The degree of sexual dimorphism varies between populations, separated both chronologically and geographically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a single or combined limb bone measurements have shown to be accurate 80-90% of the time [10]. Metric standards of the lower limb have been used extensively for sex determination, however as not all bones may be recovered it is important to utilise other skeletal elements [2,5]. For example, it has been demonstrated that arm bone dimensions are sexually dimorphic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies dealt with combinations of the three bones [3][4][5][6][7] while others focused on each bone separately. Humerus has been studied intensively and standards have been obtained for several different ethnic groups [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Although not as popular as humerus, ulna has been the subject of several osteometric studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; so as the radius [22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%