2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.917218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Method of Compatibility Assessment for Novel Ablation Technologies With Different 3D Navigation Systems

Abstract: BackgroundNew technologies for ablation procedures are often produced by different companies with no cross-compatibility out of the box. This is not a negligible clinical problem since those separately developed devices are often used together. The aim of this study was to develop a bench-testing method to assess compatibility between the DiamondTemp ablation system (DTA) and the Rhythmia electroanatomic mapping system (EAM).MethodsDifferent setups were tested. DTA was connected to the Rhythmia EAM using the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different configurations have been tested. Reproducibility of results, in comparison with earlier testing according to the described compatibility assessment method ( 1 ). The DTA can be connected to the navigation system either by using electrogram (EGM) out cables from RF generator or from dedicated GenConnect interface to be able to filter out RF energy so it does not affect localization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four different configurations have been tested. Reproducibility of results, in comparison with earlier testing according to the described compatibility assessment method ( 1 ). The DTA can be connected to the navigation system either by using electrogram (EGM) out cables from RF generator or from dedicated GenConnect interface to be able to filter out RF energy so it does not affect localization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Reproducibility of results, in comparison with earlier testing according to the described compatibility assessment method ( 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations