Universal health coverage in ‘One ASEAN’: are migrants included?

Abstract

BackgroundAs the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) gears toward full regional integration by 2015, the cross-border mobility of workers and citizens at large is expected to further intensify in the coming years. While ASEAN member countries have already signed the Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers, the health rights of migrants still need to be addressed, especially with ongoing universal health coverage (UHC) reforms in most ASEAN countries. This paper seeks to examine the inclusion of migrants in the UHC systems of five ASEAN countries which exhibit diverse migration profiles and are currently undergoing varying stages of UHC development.DesignA scoping review of current migration trends and policies as well as ongoing UHC developments and migrant inclusion in UHC in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand was conducted.ResultsIn general, all five countries, whether receiving or sending, have schemes that cover migrants to varying extents. Thailand even allows undocumented migrants to opt into its Compulsory Migrant Health Insurance scheme, while Malaysia and Singapore are still yet to consider including migrants in their government-run UHC systems. In terms of predominantly sending countries, the Philippines's social health insurance provides outbound migrants with portable insurance yet with limited benefits, while Indonesia still needs to strengthen the implementation of its compulsory migrant insurance which has a health insurance component. Overall, the five ASEAN countries continue to face implementation challenges, and will need to improve on their UHC design in order to ensure genuine inclusion of migrants, including undocumented migrants. However, such reforms will require strong political decisions from agencies outside the health sector that govern migration and labor policies. Furthermore, countries must engage in multilateral and bilateral dialogue as they redefine UHC beyond the basis of citizenship and reimagine UHC systems that transcend national borders.ConclusionsBy enhancing migrant coverage, ASEAN countries can make UHC systems truly ‘universal’. Migrant inclusion in UHC is a human rights imperative, and it is in ASEAN's best interest to protect the health of migrants as it pursues the path toward collective social progress and regional economic prosperity.

Are migrant workers in Singapore receiving adequate healthcare? A survey of doctors working in public tertiary healthcare institutions

“…(2) However, migrant workers are not entitled to the healthcare subsidies provided by the Singapore government, and do not qualify for the financing schemes available to Singaporeans and permanent residents. (3) Currently, under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, employers of low-wage migrant domestic and non-domestic workers are mandated by law to provide medical insurance coverage of at least SGD15,000 a year for inpatient fees and day surgeries. (4) In addition, employers of migrant workers holding Work Permit or S Pass are required legally to bear the costs of the provision of adequate medical treatment.…”

Healthcare-seeking behaviour, barriers and mental health of non-domestic migrant workers in Singapore

“…They are also subject to increased risk of work-related injury and infectious diseases 7–9. Migrant workers do not qualify for medical subsidies and are not covered by the healthcare financing schemes that citizens fall under 10. Instead, employers of low and semiskilled workers, holding Work Permits and S Passes, respectively, are legally required to provide inpatient and day surgery medical insurance coverage of ≥$15 000 a year 11.…”

Transnational medical travel: patient mobility, shifting health system entitlements and attachments

“…Growing anti-immigrant sentiment has led, for instance, to pressure on public-sector healthcare professionals to act increasingly as national resource gate-keepers by checking the passports and migration credentials of anyone seeking care and reporting patients with irregular status to the relevant authorities for fines, detainment and even deportation (Ormond and Nah 2019). Political and societal debates and actions such as these have, understandably, led scholars working in the field of migrant health to mainly focus on drawing crucial attention to the diverse structural conditions in refugees' and immigrants' countries of residence that shape their access to and use of formal healthcare services and that support or threaten their physical and psychological welfare (Nazroo 2001;Choi 2013;Guinto et al 2015;Wang and Kwak 2015;European Network to Reduce Vulnerabilities in Health 2017).…”