“…For example the relationship between "legal commitments" and "strategic priorities" is not simply linguistic but reflects the interaction among the elements of the framework within this cluster (indicators) -how one affects the others and is in turn affected by them, which is what converts these elements into a unified whole. [46] Specifically, the Legal Commitments and Strategic Priorities cluster underlines the obligation of States to incorporate the key provisions of the CRPD in domestic legislation [67] (Indicators #103, #20, #79, #14, #15, #56, #81) as a crucial means in realizing the right to health of PWD [68] and strengthening health systems [69,70] and suggests that national priorities in the context of SGDs (Indicators #17, #66, #39) be informed by the international human rights standards, a view that is shared widely among leading commentators and global health experts [71][72][73]. A similar interpretation can occur across other clusters of indicators allowing an in depth examination of systemic issues pertaining to rehabilitation service delivery, financing and workforce planning.…”