1976
DOI: 10.2307/2200572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

United States v. F/V Taiyo Maru. 395 F. Supp. 413

Abstract: We have recently described the construction of a dual-cell, nonlinear dielectric spectrometer, and its application to the study of cell suspensions of S. cereuisiae (A.M. Woodward and D.B. Kell, Bioelectro-them. Bioenerg., 24 (1990) 83). Substantial, odd harmonics were generated by these cells when stimulated by very modest sinusoidal electrical fields, within fairly sharp voltage-and frequency windows (ca. 0.8-2.5 V cm-', l-50 Hz). Resting cells were found to generate only odd-numbered harmonics. In the prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I find, therefore, that respect for the relationship between our state and federal courts weighs heavily against exercising jurisdiction over Muhammad's declaratory judgment action for violation. 20 The court's respect for the judicial relationship overrode a commitment to the principle of religious freedom. In so overriding this freedom, which maintains a high priority in the mythology of American freedom, the court evaded Muhammad's entitlement to have her case taken up in a court through a series of procedural grounds.…”
Section: Misrecognition and Epistemic Silencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I find, therefore, that respect for the relationship between our state and federal courts weighs heavily against exercising jurisdiction over Muhammad's declaratory judgment action for violation. 20 The court's respect for the judicial relationship overrode a commitment to the principle of religious freedom. In so overriding this freedom, which maintains a high priority in the mythology of American freedom, the court evaded Muhammad's entitlement to have her case taken up in a court through a series of procedural grounds.…”
Section: Misrecognition and Epistemic Silencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that suit they sought the court's help to remedy the District's long-standing failure to protect them. The federal court in the "First Evans Consent Decree" upheld the claims of the disabled [2]. This resulted in the city enacting "The Mentally Retarded Citizens Constitutional Rights and Dignity Act of 1978" (hereafter 1978 Act) [3].…”
Section: Attorney Oversightmentioning
confidence: 99%