“…263,270,271 A nonsignificant positive association was found among male bookbinders, printers, photoengravers and typesetters (SIR 5 2.24, 95% CI: 0.96-4.41). 272 Other occupational groups for which nonsignificant findings have been reported include synthetic abrasive product workers, 273 266,295 Several case-control studies have found significant associations of NHL risk with various occupational categories, including chemical manufacturing maintenance subgroups, 236 cigarette factory workers, 296 electrical fitters, 297 rail and road transport workers, 266 accountants, 266 secretaries, 266 photographic lab workers, 266 carpenters, 21,214 managerial and professional workers 176,260 and printing workers. 34,298 These studies are uninformative as a lack of individual exposure information in many of these studies precludes exposure-specific interpretations.…”