United States Medical School Academic Faculty Workforce Diversity, Institutional Characteristics, and Geographical Distributions From 2014-2018

Abstract

Academic healthcare workforce diversity is important in addressing health disparities. Our goal was to evaluate trends and associations in faculty diversity of United States (US) medical schools over a five-year period. MethodsWe analyzed the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Roster data of 151 US medical schools from 2014-2018. Outcome faculty variables were female gender, underrepresented in medicine (UiM), age, and professorial representation. Predictor variables included geographical distributions, and institutional characteristics. Statistical analysis included Jonckheere-Terpstra test, ANOVA, and regression analysis. ResultsFemale faculty increased from 37.6% to 40.4% (p<0.001), senior faculty (age >60 years) from 22.6% to 25.9% (p=0.001) while UiM faculty stayed relatively flat from 9.74% to 10.08% (p=0.773). UiM [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.39, p=0.015], and female faculty (aOR=0.3, p=0.001) had independently significantly decreased associations with professorial representation, while senior faculty had increased associations (aOR=3.82, p<0.001). Significant independent differences occurred in female, UiM, and professorial faculty distributions within US regions; Hispanic faculty were highest in Southwest (6.57%) and lowest in Midwest region (1.59%), while African-American faculty were highest in Southeast (8.15%) but lowest in the West (3.12%). UiM faculty had significantly independent decreased associations with MD/PhD degree (aOR=0.30, p=0.004) and higher US ranking institutions (aOR=0.45, p=0.009). ConclusionsFrom 2014 to 2018, female faculty increased modestly while the UiM faculty trend remained flat. Female and UiM faculty were less represented at the professor level. UiM faculty were less represented in higher-ranking institutions. Geographic location is associated with faculty diversity.

Staying Virtual: A Survey Study of the Virtual Lecture Experience in Academic Medicine

“…The proportion of respondents who self-identified as a woman or man was similar, and 4% were from an underrepresented in medicine (URiM) racial or ethnic group (Black or African American; Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish origin; American Indian or Alaska native; or Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islander). 14 Most faculty were clinicians, clinician-educators, or clinician-scientists. The proportions of women and men who were instructors or assistant professors (63%) versus associate or full professors (36%) did not differ ( P = .780), and one respondent did not list their faculty rank (1%).…”

Inspiring and Preparing Our Future Leaders: Evaluating the Impact of the Early Career Women’s Leadership Program

“… 32 Seventeen percent of the ECWLP women were from ethnically or racially underrepresented groups in medicine. 27 This exceeds the 10% of total full-time faculty who are ethnically or racially underrepresented at JHUSOM. Appreciating differences and empathy are core leadership competencies that enhance the experience of teams and organizations.…”

“…We asked participants to consider how to collaborate with, lead, and report to people who have different values and personality types. Underrepresented women (including women of color 27 and women with intersectional identities such as a different sexual orientation or disability) face especially high barriers to advancement. 32 Seventeen percent of the ECWLP women were from ethnically or racially underrepresented groups in medicine.…”

“…We defined racially or ethnically underrepresented groups in medicine as Black or African American; Hispanic, Latinx, or Spanish origin; American Indian or Alaska Native; or Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. 27 The JHUSOM Institutional Research Board approved this study (protocol IRB00340091), and consent to participate in the research was obtained as part of the questionnaire.…”

Commitment to inclusion: The importance of collaboration in gender equity work

“…Leaders and faculty of all genders should partner to support programs and systems that equitably advance underrepresented women. Women with intersectional identities, such as women of color 39 , 40 or who have a disability 41 or different sexual orientation, 42 encounter particularly high barriers to advancement. These include discrimination, bias, and historic institutional racism.…”