2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

United States and South Korean citizens’ interpretation and assessment of COVID-19 quantitative data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of the 2020 responses mentioned the sometimes problematic way in which numbers, data, and graphs are used in the public sphere (e.g., Ernest, 2020;Kwon et al, 2021;Yoon et al, 2021). Many respondents saw their emphasis on relevant educational goals reinforced, for example, statistical and data literacy, modeling, critical thinking, and public communication.…”
Section: Educational Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of the 2020 responses mentioned the sometimes problematic way in which numbers, data, and graphs are used in the public sphere (e.g., Ernest, 2020;Kwon et al, 2021;Yoon et al, 2021). Many respondents saw their emphasis on relevant educational goals reinforced, for example, statistical and data literacy, modeling, critical thinking, and public communication.…”
Section: Educational Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media items also documented (Table 5 : example 12) rumors and fake evidence circulating on social networks that resulted in a defiant attitude toward social distancing requirements in some (virtual) communities. In addition, some items discussed the willingness of specific social groups to accept potentially unreliable reports, or “fake news” (Table 5 : example 2) that involved misleading statistics, affecting their compliance with regulations during the pandemic (see also Yoon et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Findings: Mathematics and Statistics Demands In Pandemic-rel...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COViD-Taser project focuses on exploring how people interpreted media that contained quantitative data representations (www.covidtaser.com/). The project team routinely makes use of CA and the QR In one study, their usage of CA suggested that citizens in both the United States and South Korea struggled to compare the risk of dying from the flu and from COVID-19, with only about 40% (13 of 32) making a multiplicative comparison of the risks (Yoon et al, 2021). They found that the participants struggled to reason quantitatively about individual risks, which became a barrier for making multiplicative comparisons.…”
Section: Relative Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%