2010
DOI: 10.1093/icon/mop038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

United Kingdom: The royal prerogative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Competition in public procurement allows governments to deliver key goods and services for the population and businesses. The government acts as a consumer of goods and services, making purchases on behalf of 128 See, for example, PWC (2013); Poole (2010); IATA (2006); InterVistas (2006); Myburgh, Sheik, Fiandeiro, and Hodge (2006).…”
Section: Public Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition in public procurement allows governments to deliver key goods and services for the population and businesses. The government acts as a consumer of goods and services, making purchases on behalf of 128 See, for example, PWC (2013); Poole (2010); IATA (2006); InterVistas (2006); Myburgh, Sheik, Fiandeiro, and Hodge (2006).…”
Section: Public Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a worrisome hallmark of the Chagos case is the repeated and overzealous use by the executive of a legitimate but extreme form of power: the royal prerogative. The defining characteristic of prerogative power is that its exercise does not require the approval of parliament and is thus far removed from the modern archetype of legitimate law-making, which, in the British polity, is the act of parliament (Poole, 2010). Consequently, when implemented, it necessitates a careful historical inquiry to ascertain whether there is any precedent for the exercise of the power in the given circumstances.…”
Section: Fragmenting the Right To Abode Through Judicial Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government reacted by suggesting that the Chagossians could relocate to other islands in the Chagos archipelago, but not to Diego Garcia. 93 In 2002 they won full UK citizenship, different from the colonial BIOT citizenship that they had claimed in the 1980s, which afforded them the right to reside neither in Britain nor in the actual BIOT. In 2003, a separate legal action was launched, demanding compensation and resettlement, which was rejected by the High Court.…”
Section: Third Move: Budget Debates Further Militarisation and Coldmentioning
confidence: 99%