1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-8914(63)80277-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unitarity and causality in a renormalizable field theory with unstable particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
442
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(464 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
442
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the imaginary part amounts to performing all possible cuts of the self-energy insertions while the unstable particle is not cut [28]. To obtain the total cross section for a flavourspecific four-fermion final state, only the cuts through these specific fermion lines have to be taken into account.…”
Section: Production Vertex Production-decay Vertices and The Leadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the imaginary part amounts to performing all possible cuts of the self-energy insertions while the unstable particle is not cut [28]. To obtain the total cross section for a flavourspecific four-fermion final state, only the cuts through these specific fermion lines have to be taken into account.…”
Section: Production Vertex Production-decay Vertices and The Leadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalized set of diagrams includes 2 n such diagrams if the original diagram had n vertex and sources. These diagrams obey the so-called "largest time equation" [52,53]. If one examines these diagrams before the times at the vertices and sources have been integrated out, and assumes that the vertex or source with the largest time is numbered i, it is easy to prove that…”
Section: Cutting Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an old well-known problem [16,20]. However, we cannot get rid of the t-channel singularity when we replace the troublesome W + (i) by the well-defined asymptotic state e + ν e and consider instead 3 → 2 or 3 → 3 processes like e + ν e ν e → ν e W + .…”
Section: ))mentioning
confidence: 99%