2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101115
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unit process energy consumption analysis and models for Electron Beam Melting (EBM): Effects of process and part designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of deposited material (m EBM , which accounts for the weight of the components, the support structures, and the allowances removed when finishing) was 1445.5 g; therefore, the specific electric energy consumption of the EBM machine, including the productive and nonproductive times, was 184.3 MJ/kg. This value is coherent with the experimental characterization performed on the same AM machine by Lunetto et al [37], and it is only slightly higher than the 61-177 MJ/kg range proposed by Kellens et al [26] in their literature review. The average deposition rate, which was computed as the ratio of m EBM to the build time, was 8.5 • 10 −2 kg/h.…”
Section: Electron Beam Meltingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The amount of deposited material (m EBM , which accounts for the weight of the components, the support structures, and the allowances removed when finishing) was 1445.5 g; therefore, the specific electric energy consumption of the EBM machine, including the productive and nonproductive times, was 184.3 MJ/kg. This value is coherent with the experimental characterization performed on the same AM machine by Lunetto et al [37], and it is only slightly higher than the 61-177 MJ/kg range proposed by Kellens et al [26] in their literature review. The average deposition rate, which was computed as the ratio of m EBM to the build time, was 8.5 • 10 −2 kg/h.…”
Section: Electron Beam Meltingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The outer boundary of the part is first built, known as contouring, and then the powder inside the contour begins to melt, forming a single sheet. [71,72].…”
Section: Electron Beam Meltingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive material research in close cooperation with machine technology development enabled, that SLA and FFF can be used recently for the realization of functional composites e.g., with piezoelectric, conductive, ferroelectric, or magnetic properties [8][9][10][11][12]. Whilst metal parts are mainly printed directly by the different variants of Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Selective Laser Melting (SLM), or quite recently by Electron Beam Melting (EBM) [13][14][15][16], ceramic parts can be printed via SLA and FFF using highly filled low viscous resins (SLA) or molten thermoplastics (FFF). In the case of SLA, this technology has been commercialized (Lithoz GmbH, Vienna, Austria, www.lithoz.com), recent research can be found in [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%