1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00396778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness results for optimization problems with prescribed rearrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguing as in Theorem 3.1 in [8], we can prove that problem (52) is the unique problem such that equality holds in (53). More precisely we have THEOREM 5.2 Let u and w the solutions of (50) and (52) respectively.…”
Section: Since Nwnr Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Arguing as in Theorem 3.1 in [8], we can prove that problem (52) is the unique problem such that equality holds in (53). More precisely we have THEOREM 5.2 Let u and w the solutions of (50) and (52) respectively.…”
Section: Since Nwnr Nmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ferone and Posteraro have extended their results to more general equations in [17]. The case of equalities in comparison results for L ∞ or L 1 norm of the solutions has been discussed in [8] for degenerate elliptic equations without lower order terms. However, by observing the proofs in the articles mentioned above, we find that it is an essential condition that the distribution functions of solutions to "symmetrized" problems are absolutely continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%