1986
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1986.4767749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness of the Gaussian Kernel for Scale-Space Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
316
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 702 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
316
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Formulations closely related to this have been used when proving the uniqueness of Gaussian filtering for generating scale-space representations for continuous or discrete signals (Koenderink 1984, Babaud et al 1986, Yuille & Poggio 1986, Lindeberg 1990, Lindeberg 1994, Lindeberg 1996 with extension to non-linear diffusion schemes by (Weickert 1998). While scale invariance may at first also be regarded as a very desirable and thus a primary property of a multi-scale representation, this criterion has the limitation that it can only be formulated for signals defined on a continuous domain.…”
Section: Choice Of Scale-space Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formulations closely related to this have been used when proving the uniqueness of Gaussian filtering for generating scale-space representations for continuous or discrete signals (Koenderink 1984, Babaud et al 1986, Yuille & Poggio 1986, Lindeberg 1990, Lindeberg 1994, Lindeberg 1996 with extension to non-linear diffusion schemes by (Weickert 1998). While scale invariance may at first also be regarded as a very desirable and thus a primary property of a multi-scale representation, this criterion has the limitation that it can only be formulated for signals defined on a continuous domain.…”
Section: Choice Of Scale-space Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This insight is a major motivation for the development of multi-scale representations such as pyramids (Burt 1981, Crowley 1981 and scale-space representation (Iijima 1962, Witkin 1983, Koenderink 1984, Babaud et al 1986, Yuille & Poggio 1986, Koenderink & van Doorn 1992, Lindeberg 1994, Pauwels et al 1995, Florack 1997); see also (Alvarez et al 1993, ter Haar Romeny 1994, Sporring et al 1996, ter Haar Romeny et al 1997, Weickert 1998, Nielsen et al 1999, Kerckhove 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to track the maxima from small to large scales, and generally to have a non-committed visual front-end, it is desirable to use a convolution kernel that does not introduce new maxima as the scale increases-since these would be spurious detail due to the kernel rather than reflecting true structure in the image. In this context, several researchers (including among others 1 Koenderink, 1984;Babaud et al, 1986;Yuille and Poggio, 1986;Roberts, 1997) proved that the Gaussian kernel never creates new maxima in 1D and, further, is the only kernel to do so. Their proofs are typically based on the following points.…”
Section: Scale-space Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original Gaussian scale-space theory, proposed by Iijima [5] and later by Witkin [6], has been shown to be the only viable linear scale-space in image processing [7]. Non-linear scale-space research has generally focused on nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs), such as those used in anisotropic diffusion techniques, and on mathematical morphology.…”
Section: Linear Scale-space and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven that the Gaussian is the only linear convolution kernel that satisfies the scale-space monotone requirement in one dimension (1-D), with zero-crossing of the second derivative defined as features [7,8]. However, in two dimensions (2-D), with zerocrossings of the Laplacian as features, "a closed zero-crossing contour can split into two as the scale increases .…”
Section: Linear Scale-space and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%