2004
DOI: 10.1080/10236190410001710301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness for Boundary Value Problems for Second Order Finite Difference Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results unify and generalize the results of Mawhin, Tonkes and Thompson [7] and those given in Protter and Weinberger [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results unify and generalize the results of Mawhin, Tonkes and Thompson [7] and those given in Protter and Weinberger [8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this paper we establish time scales analogues of the results of [7] and [8] as well as analogues of other maximum principles. In a forthcoming paper we will apply these to obtain a priori bounds, uniqueness and oscillation results for boundary value problems for second order dynamic equations on time scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results extend the continuous results given in Protter and Weinberger [14], and their discrete counterparts, see Agarwal [1] for general results, Agarwal et al [2] for oscillation results, Cheng [5] for alternative applications of maximum principles, and Mawhin et al [13] for non-linear comparisons, uniqueness results and approximations. The main contribution of this work consists in the fact that the presented results show the precise transition from the continuous to the discrete setting.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Recently, Mawhin et al [13] established discrete analogues of the strong maximum principle and its variants for ordinary differential equations (see Protter and Weinberger [14]). They applied their results to answer some uniqueness questions posed in Thompson [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%